BIOTECH labs - the other possibility:

Red Terror!

Imperial playbook
Starvation helps forment fervour
Does this History provide blowback
that has galvanised Neo-Nationalism
within the Russian & ex Soviet border regions?

(Left; The colors on the Ukrainian flag represent blue for sky & yellow for the fields of wheat)

The Red Terror was carried out in post-revolutionary Russia by the Cheka headed by Felix Dzerzhinsky along with units of the Red Army. The Red Terror started as a result of an attempt to kill Vladimir Lenin by Fanni Kaplin in August 1918 and the murder of the Cheka leader in St. Petersburg. This failed assassination attempt on Lenin was used as a rationale for the secret police and the army to round up and deal with anyone suspected of counter-revolutionary activities. From his hospital bed Lenin instructed the Cheka to "prepare for terror".

There was no obvious government body that could hold back the work of the Cheka. Dzerzhinsky could simply explain the organisation's work: for example the arrest and execution of 800 people in St. Petersburg in 1918 was explained away as those executed were '˜enemies of the state' or 'enemies of the revolution'. Few were brave enough to argue with such an accusation in case they themselves were accused of the same crime. None of the 800 was put on trial. They were arrested and then shot. Dzerzhinsky himself said that the Cheka operated on a 24 hour basis: those who were held were usually dealt with within 24 hours. The Red Terror last from September 1918 to October 1918 though some believe that it actually lasted until the end of the Russian Civil War. The work of the Cheka during the Red Terror received the support of Lenin who argued on its behalf that the people they were dealing with were trying to re-establish into power those who had abused and exploited others in pre-revolutionary Russia. Above all else Lenin wanted to keep what had been won during the months of 1917. Therefore the Cheka was given effectively a free rein in Russia. Someone's occupation or the size/value of their house could be enough to seal their fate.

The work done during the Red Terror also received support from a leading Bolshevik '“ Gregory Zinoviev. He said that the enemies of the Bolshevik government should be "annihilated". Lenin himself wrote to Dzerzhinsky that the opponents of the Bolshevik government should be made "to tremble".

Given that the future USSR was in chaos in 1918 and that the work was done by the secret police, it is hard to find accurate figures of those who suffered during the Red Terror. If it was done to make people "tremble" then there is a chance that the figures were exaggerated simply to scare potential opponents into acquiescence. It is thought that between 10,000 to 15,000 people were summarily executed by the Cheka between September and October 1918 in areas under the formal control of the Bolsheviks '“ such figures were published in official journals and openly publicised. As there were no public trials, such figures cannot be verified. However, it is thought that the figures for summary executions in areas previously under the control of the Whites were far higher than 15,000. Lenin himself gave the order for the execution of 50,000 in the Crimea alone and some include these figures as part of the "Red Terror" as opposed to being the end result of the Russian Civil War.

The Red Terror resulted in the execution of thousands of men classified as "bandits". However, the term never had a legal definition and it seems very likely that it became a one-word fits all to explain the arrest and then execution of suspects. Those who harboured the thousands of deserters from the Red Army were arrested and punished as they were branded "bandits". This meant that many families suffered as the result of just one member of it defying the law.

History Learning site

The Holodomor's Death Toll

The Ukrainian famine'”known as the Holodomor, a combination of the Ukrainian words for "starvation" and "to inflict death"'”by one estimate claimed the lives of 3.9 million people, about 13 percent of the population. And, unlike other famines in history caused by blight or drought, this was caused when a dictator wanted both to replace Ukraine's small farms with state-run collectives and punish independence-minded Ukrainians who posed a threat to his totalitarian authority.

"The Ukrainian famine was a clear case of a man-made famine," explains Alex de Waal, executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University and author of the 2018 book, Mass Starvation: The History and Future of Famine. He describes it as "a hybrid'¦of a famine caused by calamitous social-economic policies and one aimed at a particular population for repression or punishment."

In those days, Ukraine'”a Texas-sized nation along the Black Sea to the west of Russia'”was a part of the Soviet Union, then ruled by Stalin. In 1929, as part of his plan to rapidly create a totally communist economy, Stalin had imposed collectivization, which replaced individually owned and operated farms with big state-run collectives. Ukraine's small, mostly subsistence farmers resisted giving up their land and livelihoods.

The History Channel

"if you've ever eaten a slice of bread,
you can think of Ukraine"

This Modern Farmer article spins origins of Turk red Wheat for Pro-Ukraine war propaganda - the origins of the Wheat seed are from Crimea - and at the time the region was under Ottoman rule.

A classic example of Bernaysian behavioral PR/advertising/propaganda technique - making someone think of a concept, while taking part in an activity or consuming something.

BIOTECH & GM dividends

Neoliberalizing The Ukrainian breadbasket to GMO BIOTECH conglomerates

Now consider this:

The Russian Ukraine conflict has brought the issue of food security to centre stage

Russia is the largest Wheat exporting country, holding almost 17% of global export supply, Ukraine holds a share of almost 12%

Countries are now de facto Elite / Fortune 500 Corporate interest political PR machines carrying out the wishes of huge economic geo-political interests. NATO is a conglomerate of countries using the military to ensure it's interests are met.

Remembering, of course that in The 4th Industrial revolution: food will be drugs, as biopharma & genetic editing make lab grown staple foods, a neutraceutical


Lab grown meat:

"Speculation on who the winners of the nutraceutical venture will be is becoming a popular topic in papers discussing the pharmaceutical industry. Because new medicines are harder to find and more expensive and risky to develop than ever before, many companies, for example, Du Pont, Abbott Laboratories and Warner Lambert, which have produced conventional pharmaceuticals in the past are now merging to survive, or are turning to nutraceuticals.

This offers them a chance of a very large market. Datamonitor, a website that follows market trends, estimates the nutraceutical market at $17bn, and Dr Felice himself, speaking at a conference in 1998, put the figure at $250bn in America alone.3 Although these estimates vary widely, the nutraceuticals market is undoubtably very large and growing. As companies increase in size, more jobs may be created for industrial pharmacists, but the real impact of nutraceuticals on pharmacy will be in the community."

Pharmaceutical Journal - 8 JUL 2000

WEF CRISPR AGRI controlled demolition?

For those in the world who enjoy relative food security, appetite for meat is set to grow. Global demand for beef and other ruminant meats could rise by 88% between 2010 to 2050, according to a World Resources Institute analysis of FAO data.

This would mean needing extra pastureland the size of India to feed livestock, it estimates, and the deforestation that would entail would put an end to the goal of limiting global temperature rises to 1.5°C. And that's before taking into account emissions from the animals themselves.

As the world looks to reset its economy, along with food systems, in a cleaner way post-pandemic, one more sustainable solution coming to fruition is cultured meat.

Will we eat lab grown meat? WEF

What is cultured meat?

The process of growing meat in a laboratory involves taking stem cells from a live animal and growing them in nutrient-rich conditions.

For example, a small biopsy of skeletal muscle is taken from a cow, from which the stem cells are isolated and grown in a bioreactor with cell culture media.

The cells are split into several cell types including muscle and fat cells. This biomass is then processed to form the edible final product.

WEF - 6 Oct 2020

CRISPR/GMO, breeding beans & wheat? & COWS!


Is the future of Farming Inside & UP?

Breeding Better Beans

FDA approves CRISPR Cows for Sustainable Meat

BIOTECH & GM dividends

Biolab 2010: for health research; honest guv!


In order to develop its biotech capabilities within the pharmaceutical industry, Ukraine began collaborating with international organizations, NATO-Ukraine with funding from US venture capital firm "Dhareh Fisher Jurvetson" (DFJ)

BioWeapons Monitor 2014

Silicon Valley GMO - funding

Disruptive technologies?

Ukraine GMO seed development; 2021

Knock on effect into Middle east

The government of Ukraine supported two draft laws in the field of GMO regulation.

On the next stage, they will be put on vote in the parliament. The first draft law is aimed at regulating state control over the use of GMOs and the circulation of GM products. The second draft law will provide for the increased liability for violations in the field of GMO management.

Support to these draft laws, their adoption and further implementation will help create transparent rules for doing business on GMOs and strengthen state control in this area. In particular, it is envisaged to define clear procedures and mechanisms for handling of GMOs, requirements for labeling of GM products that will not mislead consumers. It is also proposed to strengthen the responsibility and increase the size of fines to prevent violations in this field, " said Deputy Minister of Economy of Ukraine Iryna Novikova.

Among the innovations of the draft law on state regulation in the field of GMOs:

Division of powers of public authorities in order to eliminate duplication of functions in the field of GMO management;

Improving the system for assessing the risks of GMOs in terms of possible effects on human health and the environment;

European mechanisms of state registration of GMOs;

Improvement of the requirements for labeling of GM products and introduce rules on its traceability; Strengthened state control in the field of GMO management, as well as established liability for violations of legislation in this area.

Adoption of these draft laws and their implementation will contribute to setting of transparent rules for doing business with the GMOs and will strengthen state control in this field. Discussion about legal circulation of GMOs in Ukraine last already many years. As result, at the moment, there are no officially registered GM varieties in Ukraine. Since 2007, it is not allowed to grow GM crops for commercial purposes. Yet, market operators report violations of the law and complain about limited access to technologies. It is in the interest of all market participants to contribute to building the transparent market free from smuggling and shadow trade.

The objective of the new draft law "On state regulation of genetic engineering and state control over the circulation of genetically modified organisms and genetically modified products to ensure food security" is food security and stability in Ukraine. The new legislation, which is expected to come in effect 3 years after adoption, is aimed to establish clear procedures for working with GM. This law is expected to set the definition of mechanisms, procedures for monitoring and control over the use of GMOs.

Source: Agricultural Attaché Network via European seed.com

Laws on GMO:


Food safety:

Food safety is one of the urgent problems of improvement of living standards and social protection of the population and it takes one of the most important places among the present problems of humanity. The range of the problems relating to provision of people with food of required quantity and quality, and forms the essence of the state food policy. Problems of reforming of land relations and development of agricultural and food sector, export and import of food products, supply and use of genetically modified products and raw materials, lack of proper institutional, regulatory and legal mechanisms of governance of food safety point to the importance of improvement of the state governance of food safety in the country. FOOD SAFETY OF UKRAINE: THEORY AND PRACTICE

WTO notification (G/TBT/N/UKR/188)

next: The history of making a powderkeg:

Anti Imperialism: Did the Intermarium become the template for NATO?