 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Supranational power grab
Welcome to the Global Zoo;
Capt Wardrobe - October 2021
Petry dish panopticon.
|
2019:
It's almost as if "project fear" was in fact reality
Emergency budget
Supply chains disrupted.
Jobs leaving.
Currency tanking.
It's almost as if "project fear" was in fact project reality,
and the lying leavers have been talking out of their arses for three years (in addition to 40 years of whining without a plan).
|
 |
Covid 19 & climate change
pushing of FEAR via
so called attacks on supply chain infrastructure
continue in the UK
 |
  |
 |
is an interesting character to observe & note...
  This had absolutely nothing to do with Cummings, honest guv! |
Dominic Mckenzie Cummings (born 25 November 1971) is a British political strategist who served as chief adviser to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson from 24 July 2019 until 13 November 2020.[1]
From 2007 to 2014, he was a special adviser to Michael Gove, including the time that Gove served as Education Secretary, leaving when Gove was made Chief Whip in a cabinet reshuffle. From 2015 to 2016, Cummings was director of Vote Leave, an organisation which successfully executed the 2016 referendum campaign for Britain's exit from the European Union. After Johnson was appointed Prime Minister in July 2019, Cummings was appointed as Chief Adviser to the Prime Minister. Cummings had a contentious relationship with Chancellor Sajid Javid which culminated in Javid's resignation in February 2020 after he refused to comply with Cummings's request to dismiss his special advisers.
A scandal involving Cummings occurred in May 2020, after it was reported that he travelled to his parents' farm in Durham during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown while experiencing COVID-19 symptoms. 45 Conservative MPs called for his resignation and Cummings was criticised by opposition parties for noncompliance with public health restrictions.[2][3] After Cummings held a press conference explaining his journey, Prime Minister Johnson supported his chief adviser by saying Cummings had acted "responsibly, legally and with integrity".[4] Durham police said that they did not consider an offence was committed when Cummings travelled from London to Durham and that a minor breach might have occurred in travelling from there to Barnard Castle. The scandal is thought to have affected the public's trust in the government's pandemic response.[5]
After leaving Downing Street in November 2020, Cummings has criticised the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic and Johnson's leadership.
|
and set up state of the art - Seeing Rooms
to utilise Cognitive technologies
|
January 2, 2020 by dominiccummings
"Two hands are a lot" - we're hiring data scientists, project managers, policy experts, assorted weirdos...
There is a huge amount of low hanging fruit - trillion dollar bills lying on the street - in the intersection of:
the selection, education and training of people for high performance
the frontiers of the science of prediction
data science, AI and cognitive technologies
Tetlock/IARPA prediction tournaments that could easily be extended to consider 'clusters' of issues around themes like Brexit to improve policy and project management)
communication (e.g Cialdini)
decision-making institutions at the apex of government.
dominiccummings.com
see also blog from June 26, 2019 by dominiccummings
Introduction
This blog looks at an intersection of decision-making, technology, high performance teams and government. It sketches some ideas of physicist Michael Nielsen about cognitive technologies and of computer visionary Bret Victor about the creation of dynamic tools to help understand complex systems and 'argue with evidence', such as 'tools for authoring dynamic documents', and 'Seeing Rooms' for decision-makers - i.e rooms designed to support decisions in complex environments.
It compares normal Cabinet rooms, such as that used in summer 1914 or October 1962, with state-of-the-art Seeing Rooms. There is very powerful feedback between:
a) creating dynamic tools to see complex systems deeper (to see inside, see across time, and see across possibilities), thus making it easier to work with reliable knowledge and interactive quantitative models, semi-automating error-correction etc, and
b) the potential for big improvements in the performance of political and government decision-making.
It is relevant to Brexit and anybody thinking 'how on earth do we escape this nightmare' but 1) these ideas are not at all dependent on whether you support or oppose Brexit, about which reasonable people disagree, and 2) they are generally applicable to how to improve decision-making - for example, they are relevant to problems like 'how to make decisions during a fast moving nuclear crisis' which I blogged about recently, or if you are a journalist 'what future media could look like to help improve debate of politics'. One of the tools Nielsen discusses is a tool to make memory a choice by embedding learning in long-term memory rather than, as it is for almost all of us, an accident. I know from my days working on education reform in government that it's almost impossible to exaggerate how little those who work on education policy think about 'how to improve learning'.
Fields make huge progress when they move from stories (e.g Icarus) and authority (e.g 'witch doctor') to evidence/experiment (e.g physics, wind tunnels) and quantitative models (e.g design of modern aircraft). Political 'debate' and the processes of government are largely what they have always been - largely conflict over stories and authorities where almost nobody even tries to keep track of the facts/arguments/models they're supposedly arguing about, or tries to learn from evidence, or tries to infer useful principles from examples of extreme success/failure. We can see much better than people could in the past how to shift towards processes of government being 'partially rational discussion over facts and models and learning from the best examples of organisational success'. But one of the most fundamental and striking aspects of government is that practically nobody involved in it has the faintest interest in or knowledge of how to create high performance teams to make decisions amid uncertainty and complexity. This blindness is connected to another fundamental fact: critical institutions (including the senior civil service and the parties) are programmed to fight to stay dysfunctional, they fight to stay closed and avoid learning about high performance, they fight to exclude the most able people.
Further in the blog post Cummings also makes the observation that Government should:
"Explore what we know about the selection, education and training of people for high performance (individual/team/organisation) in different fields. "
He also criticuses the UK Government recruiting strategy to Chinas more open minded attitute to systems analysis:
in the blog post on March 4, 2019 -
‘Incidents causing potential exposures to pathogens occur frequently in the high security laboratories often known by their acronyms, BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) and BSL4. Lab incidents that lead to undetected or unreported laboratory-acquired infections can lead to the release of a disease into the community outside the lab; lab workers with such infections will leave work carrying the pathogen with them. If the agent involved were a potential pandemic pathogen, such a community release could lead to a worldwide pandemic with many fatalities. Of greatest concern is a release of a lab-created, mammalian-airborne-transmissible, highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, such as the airborne-transmissible H5N1 viruses created in the laboratories of Ron Fouchier in the Netherlands and Yoshihiro Kawaoka In Madison Wisconsin.
‘Such releases are fairly likely over time, as there are at least 14 labs (mostly in Asia) now carrying out this research. Whatever release probability the world is gambling with, it is clearly far too high a risk to human lives. Mammal-transmissible bird flu research poses a real danger of a worldwide pandemic that could kill human beings on a vast scale.
‘Human error is the main cause of potential exposures of lab workers to pathogens. Statistical data from two sources show that human error was the cause of, according to my research, 67 percent and 79.3 percent of incidents leading to potential exposures in BSL3 labs…
On the referendum#31: Project Maven,
we see Cummings reference - Qian Xuesen, who he calls dotingly and the spiritual grandfather of
Pentagon Maven Project AI
China
China: a culture of learning from systems management
'All stable processes we shall predict. All unstable processes we shall control.' von Neumann.
In Science there was an interesting article on Qian Xuesen, the godfather of China's nuclear and space programs which also had a profound affect on ideas about government. Qian studied in California at Caltech where he worked with the Hungarian mathematician Theodore von Kármán who co-founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) which worked on rockets after 1945.
'In the West, systems engineering's heyday has long passed. But in China, the discipline is deeply integrated into national planning. The city of Wuhan is preparing to host in August the International Conference on Control Science and Systems Engineering, which focuses on topics such as autonomous transportation and the "control analysis of social and human systems." Systems engineers have had a hand in projects as diverse as hydropower dam construction and China's social credit system, a vast effort aimed at using big data to track citizens' behaviour. Systems theory "doesn't just solve natural sciences problems, social science problems, and engineering technology problems," explains Xue Huifeng, director of the China Aerospace Laboratory of Social System Engineering (CALSSE) and president of the China Academy of Aerospace Systems Science and Engineering in Beijing. "It also solves governance problems."
'The field has resonated with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who in 2013 said that "comprehensively deepening reform is a complex systems engineering problem." So important is the discipline to the Chinese Communist Party that cadres in its Central Party School in Beijing are required to study it. By applying systems engineering to challenges such as maintaining social stability, the Chinese government aims to "not just understand reality or predict reality, but to control reality," says Rogier Creemers, a scholar of Chinese law at the Leiden University Institute for Area Studies in the Netherlands...
'In a building flanked by military guards, systems scientists from CALSSE sit around a large conference table, explaining to Science the complex diagrams behind their studies on controlling systems. The researchers have helped model resource management and other processes in smart cities powered by artificial intelligence. Xue, who oversees a project named for Qian at CALSSE, traces his work back to the U.S.-educated scientist. "You should not forget your original starting point," he says...
'The Chinese government claims to have wired hundreds of cities with sensors that collect data on topics including city service usage and crime. At the opening ceremony of China's 19th Party Congress last fall, Xi said smart cities were part of a "deep integration of the internet, big data, and artificial intelligence with the real economy."... Xue and colleagues, for example, are working on how smart cities can manage water resources. In Guangdong province, the researchers are evaluating how to develop a standardized approach for monitoring water use that might be extended to other smart cities.
'But Xue says that smart cities are as much about preserving societal stability as streamlining transportation flows and mitigating air pollution. Samantha Hoffman, a consultant with the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, says the program is tied to long-standing efforts to build a digital surveillance infrastructure and is "specifically there for social control reasons" (Science, 9 February, p. 628). The smart cities initiative builds on 1990s systems engineering projects - the "golden" projects - aimed at dividing cities into geographic grids for monitoring, she adds.
'Layered onto the smart cities project is another systems engineering effort: China's social credit system. In 2014, the country's State Council outlined a plan to compile data on individuals, government officials, and companies into a nationwide tracking system by 2020. The goal is to shape behaviour by using a mixture of carrots and sticks. In some citywide and commercial pilot projects already underway, individuals can be dinged for transgressions such as spreading rumors online. People who receive poor marks in the national system may eventually be barred from travel and denied access to social services, according to government documents...
'Government documents refer to the social credit system as a "social systems engineering project." Details about which systems engineers consulted on the project are scant. But one theory that may have proved useful is Qian's "open complex giant system," Zhu says. A quarter-century ago, Qian proposed that society is a system comprising millions of subsystems: individual persons, in human parlance. Maintaining control in such a system is challenging because people have diverse backgrounds, hold a broad spectrum of opinions, and communicate using a variety of media, he wrote in 1993 in the Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics. His answer sounds like an early road map for the social credit system: to use then-embryonic tools such as artificial intelligence to collect and synthesize reams of data. According to published papers, China's hard systems scientists also use approaches derived from Qian's work to monitor public opinion and gauge crowd behaviour...
[snip]
In Open Complex Giant System (1993), Qian Xuesen compares the study of physics, where large complex systems can be studied using the phenomenally successful tools of statistical mechanics, and the study of society which has no such methods. He describes an overall approach in which fields spanning physical sciences, study of the mind, medicine, geoscience and so on must be integrated in a sort of uber-field he calls 'social systems engineering'.
'Studies and practices have clearly proved that the only feasible and effective way to treat an open complex giant system is a metasynthesis from the qualitative to the quantitative, i.e. the meta-synthetic engineering method. This method has been extracted, generalized and abstracted from practical studies...'
|
welcome to the Tera-Dome?
What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2014] - Bent Flyvbjerg
Megaprojects are large-scale, complex ventures that typically cost a billion dollars or more, take many
years to develop and build, involve multiple public and private stakeholders, are transformational, and
impact millions of people.1 Hirschman (1995: vii, xi) calls such projects "privileged particles of the
development process" and points out that often they are "trait making," that is, they are designed to
ambitiously change the structure of society, as opposed to smaller and more conventional projects that
are "trait taking," i.e., they fit into pre-existing structures and do not attempt to modify these.
Megaprojects, therefore, are not just magnified versions of smaller projects.
Megaprojects are a
completely different breed of project in terms of their level of aspiration, lead times, complexity, and
stakeholder involvement. Consequently, they are also a very different type of project to manage. A
colleague likes to say that if managers of conventional projects need the equivalent of a driver's license
to do what they do then managers of megaprojects need a pilot's jumbo jet license.2 And just like you
would not want someone with only a driver's license to fly a jumbo, you don't want conventional
project managers to manage megaprojects.
Megaprojects are increasingly used as the preferred delivery model for goods and services across a
range of businesses and sectors, like infrastructure, water and energy, information technology,
industrial processing plants, mining, supply chains, enterprise systems, strategic corporate initiatives
and change programs, mergers and acquisitions, government administrative systems, banking, defense,
intelligence, air and space exploration, big science, urban regeneration, and major events. Examples of
megaprojects are high-speed rail lines, airports, seaports, motorways, hospitals, national health or
pension ICT systems, national broadband, the Olympics, large-scale signature architecture, dams,
wind farms, offshore oil and gas extraction, aluminum smelters, the development of new aircrafts, the
largest container and cruise ships, high-energy particle accelerators, and the logistics systems used to
run large supply-chain-based companies like Amazon and Maersk.
[snip]
Tera projects
"Tera" is the next unit up, as the measurement for a trillion (a thousand billion). Recent developments
in the size of the very largest projects and programs indicate we may presently be entering the "tera
era" of large-scale project management. If we consider as projects the stimulus packages that were
launched by the United States, Europe, and China to mitigate the effects of the 2008 financial and
economic crises, then we may speak of trillion-dollar projects and thus of "teraprojects." Similarly, if
the major acquisition program portfolio of the United States Department of Defense – which was
valued at 1.6 trillion dollars in 2013 – is considered a large-scale project, then this, again, would be a
teraproject (United States Government Accountability Office, 2013:2).
Projects of this size compare with the GDP of the world's top 20 nations, similar in size to the national economies of for example Australia or Canada. There is no indication that the relentless drive to scale is abating in megaproject development. Quite the opposite; scale seems to be accelerating.
|
who cares! it's all just greed & power!
|
"Very little attention had been paid to the environmental consequences of economic growth. Indeed, both capitalists and communists were convinced that there could not be much of an environmental crisis. For capitalists, the market would solve any environmental problem (for example, if resources were used too rapidly, then prices would go up and so usage would be forced down), and Marxist dogma assured Communists that technology could solve all problems." |
|
Qian Xuesen, systems analyst China's nuclear and space programs that influenced todays mega-projests - smart cities / social credit scheme
Qian Xuesen studied in California at Caltech where he worked with the Hungarian mathematician Theodore von Kariman
founder of NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab
Qian Xuesen, or Hsue-Shen Tsien Recruited from MIT, he joined Theodore von Kármán's group at Caltech.[1] During WWII, he was involved in the Manhattan Project, which ultimately led to the successful development of the first atomic bomb in America
Wikipedia
|
Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in California,
The antennas were originally built by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for the Army and were transferred to NASA in 1994. The first mission Gemini supported was the Solar Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), a cooperative mission between NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).
a-deep-space-communications-hub-in-the-desert
Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex is a Jet Propulsion Lab project
|
 Dr. Bohdan Hawrylyshyn |
1966-73 Aureo Peccei (International institute for Applied systems analysis -Austria) Founder of the Club Of Romes recommendation within its treatise "The Limits to Growth" enabled the further forming of the WEF from the intial The European Management Composium suggested by Ukrainian Technocrat, & George Soros affilated Dr. Bohdan Hawrylyshyn as an anniversary celebration for the Centre d'études industrielles (CEI) |
|
The goal is to shape policies
In 1965, Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist,
made a speech that proved inspirational to Alexander King,
the Scottish Head of Science at the OECD, they together fromed the Club Of Rome
Club Of Rome History
"
The OECD is at the heart of international co-operation.
Our Member countries work with other countries, organisations
and stakeholders worldwide to address the
pressing policy challenges of our time."
|
|
Published 1972 – The message of this book still holds today: The earth’s interlocking resources – the global system of nature in which we all live – probably cannot support present rates of economic and population growth much beyond the year 2100, if that long, even with advanced technology.
In the summer of 1970, an international team of researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology began a study of the implications of continued worldwide growth. They examined the five basic factors that determine and, in their interactions, ultimately limit growth on this planet-population increase, agricultural production, nonrenewable resource depletion, industrial output, and pollution generation.
The MIT team fed data on these five factors into a global computer model and then tested the behavior of the model under several sets of assumptions to determine alternative patterns for mankind’s future. The Limits to Growth is the nontechnical report of their findings. The book contains a message of hope, as well: Man can create a society in which he can live
|
|
Dennis L Meadows - one of the MIT professors who co-wrote the Club of Romes "limits to growth":
"Representatives of The Club Of Rome came to MIT to learn about our computer modelling
for a global study"
The Origin of "Limits to Growth" - Interview with Dennis Meadows
video
Mitre is a private Comms & defense company borne from MIT
|
|
WEF formed by Club of Rome
summarised from this source:
Crisis of Global Sustainability
By Tapio Kanninen *pages 17-19 via Google books
1971 Klaus Schwab was invited to take charge of celebrations for
the anniversary of the
Centre d'études industrielles (1946 - 1981)
"un plan de geneva"
Centre D'Etudes Industrielles
Date 1966 via the wellcome collection
But, instead of a standard dinner he organised a large conference
It came to be known as the European Management Composium.
Centre d'études industrielles (CEI) reputation
was essential to garner international atendees
Aureo Peccei influenced the birth of
International institute for Applied systems analysis (Austria)
as a representative of the Club of Rome was an invited speaker
at the Schwab initiated CEI anniversary
Gunter Paulli - assistant to Aurelio Peccei:
"The program of the symposium was jointly designed by the Club of Rome
Since Hawrylyshyn as a Club of Rome member wanted to bring club subjects to business people.
The first meeting was a success and then Schwab propoed to keep it as an annual conference.
Then the meeting did not fare well until Aurelio Peccei convinced Raymond Barre,
at that time the Vice President of the Europen Commission, and later
the Prime Minister of France to join the meeting and then it took off."
The European Management Composium only turned to global concerns
only after the Club of Rome had made an appeal for a world forum in early 1972
Klaus Schwab and his team tell in the official history of the WEF what happened
in it's third meeting in 1973:
"At the third european management symposium of 1973
the forum broadened it's european focus under the theme
"Shaping your future in Europe"
Two developments distinguished this Davos meeting.
First Aurelio Peccei, the Italian Industrialist
delivered a speech summarizing 'The Limits to Growth',
a book that had been commsioned by the Club Of Rome.
A global think tank that he founded and served
as it's first president. The study had caused a sensation
after it's publication in 1972 for calling onto question
the sustainability of global economic growth...
Second, participants spontaneously took the initiative
to draft a "code of ethics" based on Klaus Schwabs
stakeholder concept. The text was unaninomously approved
in the final session of the symposium."
The fourth paragraph of the code for ethics for corporations
starts with the long term aspiration:
The management has to serve society.
It must assume the role of a trustee of
the material universe
for future generations.
|
 |
The World3 model is a system dynamics model for computer simulation of interactions between population, industrial growth, food production and limits in the ecosystems of the earth. It was originally produced and used by a Club of Rome study that produced the model and the book The Limits to Growth (1972). The creators of the model were Dennis Meadows, project manager, and a team of 16 researchers
The model was documented in the book Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World. It added new features to Jay W. Forrester's World2 model. Since World3 was originally created, it has had minor tweaks to get to the World3/91 model used in the book Beyond the Limits, later improved to get the World3/2000 model distributed by the Institute for Policy and Social Science Research and finally the World3/2004 model used in the book Limits to Growth: the 30 year update.[2]
World3 is one of several global models that have been generated throughout the world (Mesarovic/Pestel Model, Bariloche Model, MOIRA Model, SARU Model, FUGI Model) and is probably the model that generated the spark for all later models.
|
this will become important later
|
Dennis
Donella
|
 |
July 30, 2019 -
LONDON — Cambridge Analytica, the disgraced data analytics firm, conducted work for the Leave.EU campaign and the United Kingdom Independence Party ahead of the 2016 referendum on European Union membership, according to a former Cambridge Analytica official.
The revelation — outlined in internal emails between the data analytics firm and the political groups and submitted on Tuesday to the British parliament — contrasts with repeated denials by both Leave.EU and UKIP that they used Cambridge Analytica to target voters during the Brexit ballot.
Brittany Kaiser, the former head of business development at the firm, said that Leave.EU used datasets created by Cambridge Analytica to target voters with online political messages to potentially sway public opinion in 2016. The company has been at the center of a worldwide scandal about the illegal scraping of digital information from millions of Facebook users without their consent, and how this data was potentially then used for targeted political advertising.
"I have strong reasons to believe that those datasets and analyzed data processed by Cambridge Analytica as part of a Phase 1 payable work engagement ... were later used by the Leave.EU campaign without Cambridge Analytica’s further assistance," Kaiser wrote to Damian Collins, the head of the U.K. parliament's digital, culture, media and sport committee, which has held a series of hearings into the matter over the past 18 months.
"The fact remains that chargeable work was done by Cambridge Analytica, at the direction of Leave.EU and UKIP executives, despite a contract never being signed," she added, alongside a number of internal documents outlining the relationship between her former employer and the British political groups. |
The parent company of the now famous Cambridge Analytica
Over 15 years ago - is this actually the public/private partner version
of mastering the strategic use of seeing rooms / cognitive warfare?
SCL Nato
Thread: Targeted Audience analysis & the Pentagon / MOD
USING TARGET AUDIENCE ANALYSIS TO AID STRATEGIC LEVEL DECISION MAKING
Steve Tatham August 2015
|
You Can't Handle the Truth
Psy-ops propaganda goes mainstream.
By Sharon Weinberger Sept 19, 2005
LONDON-Over the past 24 hours, seven people have checked into hospitals here with telltale symptoms. Rashes, vomiting, high temperature, and cramps: the classic signs of smallpox. Once thought wiped out, the disease is back and threatening a pandemic of epic proportions.
The government faces a dilemma: It needs people to stay home, but if the news breaks, mass panic might ensue as people flee the city, carrying the virus with them.
A shadowy media firm steps in to help orchestrate a sophisticated campaign of mass deception. Rather than alert the public to the smallpox threat, the company sets up a high-tech "ops center" to convince the public that an accident at a chemical plant threatens London. As the fictitious toxic cloud approaches the city, TV news outlets are provided graphic visuals charting the path of the invisible toxins. Londoners stay indoors, glued to the telly, convinced that even a short walk into the streets could be fatal.
|
|
This scenario may sound like a rejected plot twist from a mediocre Bond flick, but one company is dead set on making this fantasy come to life.
Strategic Communication Laboratories, a small U.K. firm specializing in "influence operations" made a very public debut this week with a glitzy exhibit occupying prime real estate at Defense Systems & Equipment International, or DSEi, the United Kingdom's largest showcase for military technology. The main attraction was a full-scale mock-up of its ops center, running simulations ranging from natural disasters to political coups.
Just to the right of the ops center, a dark-suited man with a wireless microphone paces like a carnival barker, narrating the scenarios. Above him a screen flashes among scenes of disaster, while to his right, behind thick glass, workers sit attentively before banks of computer screens, busily scrolling through data. The play actors pause only to look up at a big board that flashes ominously between "hot spots" like North Korea and Congo.
While Londoners fret over fictitious toxins, the government works to contain the smallpox outbreak. The final result, according to SCL's calculations, is that only thousands perish, rather than the 10 million originally projected. Another success.
Of course, the idea of deluding an entire city seems, well, a bit like propaganda.
"If your definition of propaganda is framing communications to do something that's going to save lives, that's fine," says Mark Broughton, SCL's public affairs director. "That's not a word I would use for that."
Then again, it's hard to know exactly what else to call it. (Company literature describes SCL's niche specialties as "psychological warfare," "public diplomacy," and "influence operations.") The smallpox scenario plays out in excruciating detail how reporters would be tapped to receive disinformation, with TV and radio stations dedicated to around-the-clock coverage. Even the eventual disclosure is carefully scripted.
In another doomsday scenario, the company assists a newly democratic country in South Asia as it struggles with corrupt politicians and a rising insurgency that threatens to bubble over into bloody revolution. SCL steps in to assist the benevolent king of "Manpurea" to temporarily seize power.
Oh, wait, that sounds a lot like Nepal, where the monarchy earlier this year ousted a corrupt government to stave off a rising Maoist movement. The problem is, the SCL scenario also sounds a lot like using a private company to help overthrow a democratically elected government. Another problem, at least in Nepal, is that the king now shows few signs of returning to democracy.
The company, which describes itself as the first private-sector provider of psychological operations, has been around since 1993. But its previous work was limited to civil operations, and it now wants to expand to military customers.
If SCL weren't so earnest, it might actually seem to be mocking itself, or perhaps George Orwell. As the end of the smallpox scenario, dramatic music fades out to a taped message urging people to "embrace" strategic communications, which it describes as "the most powerful weapon in the world." And the company Web page offers some decidedly creepy asides. "The [ops center] can override all national radio and TV broadcasts in time of crisis," it says, alluding to work the company has done in an unspecified Asian country.
The government's use of deception in the service of national security is not new. During World War II, for example, Allied forces conducted a massive misinformation campaign, called Operation Fortitude, designed to hide plans for the Normandy invasion. More recent efforts have met with controversy, however. In 2002, the Pentagon shuttered its brand new Office of Strategic Influence after public outcry over its purported plans to spread deceptive information to the foreign press.
Government deception may even be justified in some cases, according to Michael Schrage, a senior adviser to the security-studies program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "If you tell the population that there's been a bio-warfare attack, hospital emergency rooms will be overwhelmed with people who sincerely believe they have all the symptoms and require immediate attention," Schrage says.
The problem, he adds, is that in a democracy, a large-scale ruse would work just once.
The U.S. government has generally sought to limit disinformation; some agencies-such as the CIA-are explicitly prohibited by law from misleading domestic press. And while the CIA is fond of concealment, it takes pride in the belief that truth is necessary for an open government, a sentiment chiseled into the agency's lobby.
A successful outcome means thousands, not millions, will die in a catastrophe
What makes SCL's strategy so unusual is that it proposes to propagate its campaign domestically, at least some of the time, and rather than influence just opinion, it wants people to take a particular course of action. Is SCL simply hawking a flashier version of propaganda?
The spokesman's answer: "We save lives."
Yes, Broughton acknowledges, the ops center is not exactly giving the truth, but he adds, "Is it not worth giving an untruth for 48 hours to save x million people's lives? Sometimes the means to an end has to be recognized."
Who buys this stuff? Broughton declined to mention many specific clients, noting that disclosing SCL's involvement-particularly in countries with a free and open media-could make its campaigns less effective. However, he says that post-apartheid South Africa has employed SCL. So has the United Nations, he says.
The company's Web site is even vaguer, mentioning international organizations and foreign governments. A Google search produces only a handful of hits, mostly linked to the company's Web site. The company's work is based on something that even the spokesman admits you "won't find on the Web": the behavioural Dynamics Institute, a virtual lab led by Professor Phil Taylor of Leeds University.
But the company, which is funded by private investors, is now taking on a higher profile, and visitors flocked to the flashy setup here at the show. "Basically, we're launching ourselves this week on the defense market and homeland security market at the same time," Broughton explained.
If SCL has its way, its vision of strategic communications-which involves complex psychological and scientific data-could be used to shape public response to tsunamis, epidemics, or even the next Hurricane Katrina.
Well aware that the company may face controversy, particularly with its push into the defense market, Broughton emphasizes the company's role in saving lives.
"It sounds altruistic," he said. "There is some altruism in it, but we also want to earn money."
|
|
(from 2013 Forbes article:)
Palantir lives the realities of its customers: the NSA, the FBI and the CIA--an early investor through its In-Q-Tel venture fund--along with an alphabet soup of other U.S. counterterrorism and military agencies. In the last five years Palantir has become the go-to company for mining massive data sets for intelligence and law enforcement applications, with a slick software interface and coders who parachute into clients' headquarters to customize its programs. Palantir turns messy swamps of information into intuitively visualized maps, histograms and link charts. Give its so-called "forward-deployed engineers" a few days to crawl, tag and integrate every scrap of a customer's data, and Palantir can elucidate problems as disparate as terrorism, disaster response and human trafficking.
Palantir's advisors include Condoleezza Rice and former CIA director George Tenet, who says in an interview that "I wish we had a tool of its power" before 9/11. General David Petraeus, the most recent former CIA chief, describes Palantir to FORBES as "a better mousetrap when a better mousetrap was needed" and calls Karp "sheer brilliant."
|
|
Among those using Palantir to connect the dots are the Marines, who have deployed its tools in Afghanistan for forensic analysis of roadside bombs and predicting insurgent attacks. The software helped locate Mexican drug cartel members who murdered an American customs agent and tracked down hackers who installed spyware on the computer of the Dalai Lama. In the book The Finish, detailing the killing of Osama bin Laden, author Mark Bowden writes that Palantir's software "actually deserves the popular designation Killer App."
And now Palantir is emerging from the shadow world of spies and special ops to take corporate America by storm. The same tools that can predict ambushes in Iraq are helping pharmaceutical firms analyze drug data. According to a former JPMorgan Chase staffer, they've saved the firm hundreds of millions of dollars by addressing issues from cyberfraud to distressed mortgages. A Palantir user at a bank can, in seconds, see connections between a Nigerian Internet protocol address, a proxy server somewhere within the U.S. and payments flowing out from a hijacked home equity line of credit, just as military customers piece together fingerprints on artillery shell fragments, location data, anonymous tips and social media to track down Afghani bombmakers.
Those tools have allowed Palantir's T-shirted twentysomethings to woo customers away from the suits and ties of IBM, Booz Allen and Lockheed Martin with a product that deploys faster, offers cleaner results and often costs less than $1 million per installation--a fraction of the price its rivals can offer. Its commercial clients--whose identities it guards even more closely than those of its government customers--include Bank of America and News Corp. Private-sector deals now account for close to 60% of the company's revenue, which FORBES estimates will hit $450 million this year, up from less than $300 million last year. Karp projects Palantir will sign a billion dollars in new, long-term contracts in 2014, a year that may also bring the company its first profits.
The bottom line: A CIA-funded firm run by an eccentric philosopher has become one of the most valuable private companies in tech, priced at between $5 billion and $8 billion in a round of funding the company is currently pursuing. Karp owns roughly a tenth of the firm--just less than its largest stakeholder, Peter Thiel, the PayPal and Facebook billionaire. (Other billionaire investors include Ken Langone and hedge fund titan Stanley Druckenmiller.)
How A 'Deviant' Philosopher Built Palantir, A CIA-Funded Data-Mining Juggernaut
see also:
Israel-linked CIA-funded Palantir goes public, making espionage mainstream
|
Here's a very sinister puff piece
Does Neuromarketing Press A 'Buy Button' In Your Brain?
The executive director of Commercial Alert, a consumer group highly critical of Neuromarketing, wrote,
"What would happen if corporate marketers and political consultants could literally peer inside our brains and chart the neural activity that leads to our selections in the supermarket and voting booth? What if they then could trigger this neural activity by various means, so as to modify our behaviour to serve their own ends?"
This kind of response to Neuromarketing is not uncommon.
Is Neuromarketing Controversial?
The idea that Neuromarketing is any more controversial than traditional market research techniques rests on two assumptions. One, that Neuromarketing methods allow marketers to read the minds of their consumers, and two, that if they are able to read minds, they would surely have the ability to influence and control their minds as well.
Another complaint levelled against Neuromarketing is its so-called ability to push an irresistible 'buy button' in our brains thereby forcing us to want things, some of which may even be harmful to us, without being consciously aware of its influence.
While the technologies used in this field are advanced, they can by no means 'read minds' and there definitely isn't a simple 'buy button' in our brains. The brain is the most complex organ in the human body with billions of interconnected neurons, and we're only beginning to scratch the surface of how it all actually works.
|
 |
Why Is Neuromarketing Thought To Be Controversial?
What Neuromarketing does do, is provide us with some valuable insight regarding human emotion and decision-making processes. These insights, however, cannot be used to control us. Rather, these insights are improving the products, services and marketing activities of companies to better meet the needs, wants, and desires of their target markets. As a result, these target market will have better consumer experiences. Despite this, Neuromarketing has emerged from a somewhat controversial past.
Much of this has to do with the fact that many Neuromarketing practitioners were secretive about their methodological approaches, and operated within a closed black box. In addition, the field was young and the evidence base for applying many of the clinical neuroscience techniques to commercial market research was small. However, it has in the last few years matured and come into its own as a legitimate industry with a set of established market research methodologies. So much so that it is set to change, replace and, in some cases, supersede some of the more common traditional market research practices, such as focus groups and survey research. Those who argue that Neuromarketing is controversial are, therefore, not fully acquainted with the field or understand the methodologies and principles used.
The field has, and to a large degree still is, been fairly academic and closely related to the clinical neurosciences. This has meant that the methodology and the associated language of discussing findings have made it hard for non-practitioners to understand Neuromarketing methodologies and the resulting findings. This, however, has changed significantly over the last few years as the methodologies have become more accessible, translational, and embedded within the market research field.
Neuromarketing is now no more controversial than any other field of applied neuroscience. The methodologies used are robust and findings are reported more and more with transparency. The Neuromarketing Science and Business Association has outlined a clear code of ethics and its members uphold the highest standards of scientific rigour, which is often not found in other market research organisations. This may even stand Neuromarketing apart from traditional market research. Neuromarketing is scientific in its approach, which emphasises reliability, replicability, and precision. It also embodies the scientific philosophies of truth.
Many traditional market research methodologies that have have been popularised on a global level lack this kind of rigour. This then raises the question of where the controversy may actually lie...
|
"
This perspective is further strengthened in by the rapid advances of NBICs
(Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Sciences) and the
understanding of the brain. NATO's adversaries are already investing heavily in these new
technologies."
|
Trust is the target
Cognitive warfare pursues the objective of undermining trust (public trust in electoral pro-
cesses, trust in institutions, allies, politicians...). , therefore the individual becomes the
weapon, while the goal is not to attack what individuals think but rather the way they think .
It has the potential to unravel the entire social contract that underpins societies.
It is natural to trust the senses, to believe what is seen and read. But the democratisation of
automated tools and techniques using AI, no longer requiring a technological background,
enables anyone to distort information and to further undermine trust in open societies. The
use of fake news, deep fakes, Trojan horses, and digital avatars will create new suspicions
which anyone can exploit.
It is easier and cheaper for adversaries to undermine trust in our own systems than to attack
our power grids, factories or military compounds. Hence, it is likely that in the near future
there will be more attacks, from a growing and much more diverse number of potential play-
ers with a greater risk for escalation or miscalculation. The characteristics of cyberspace (lack
of regulation, difficulties and associated risks of attribution of attacks in particular) mean that
new actors, either state or non-state, are to be expected .
As the example of COVID-19 shows, the massive amount of texts on the subject, including
deliberately biased texts (example is the Lancet study on chloroquine) created an information
and knowledge overload which, in turn, generates both a loss of credibility and a need for
closure. Therefore the ability for humans to question, normally, any data/information pre-
sented is hampered, with a tendency to fall back on biases to the detriment of unfettered deci-
sion-making.
It applies to trust among individuals as well as groups, political alliances and societies.
|
|
SO...it
looks like they have a flashy PR campaign to spin pure ugly, fascistic mind control, via NLP and neuro invasion>
This is literally the military industrial complex decaring war ON HUMANITY via its Neuro pharma Advanced warfare labs.
It's old news really - but but looks to become militaristically normalised, of course...
black ops have had this capability for over 50 years.
and we can now see social media / smart phones as being useful in this goal -
developed to simplify human behaviour & imformatic neural response to clicks
on icons etc as a way of measuring action into collectable data -
simplify the human into a robotnik to control the robots decisions
based on simplified response to a set of psychologically targeted maxims -
massively enforced population wide binary mindsets...
cognitive dissonances & gamified enforced choices masked as
communitarian human responsibility / complicated ethical dilemmas.
This has been expressed through history;
The Post WW2 Cold war nuclear detente / The War on Terror / Covid 19 / Climate Change
(fear of chaos & destruction as a Psy war on humanity)
all along - destruction of community & social fabric
and the levering of public trust in post democratic Auto/Techno/cratic control
climate change linking social impact to poverty -
linked to vaccine inequality...triple whammy...
digital id is being promoted as a cure for access for sus-dev nations...
guess where the crisis will amplify? -
mid africa? south america? Indo-Asia?
The vaccine factory / supply chain-based will be hit by A new Gladio Type operation -
(Al Queda - ISIS - rebranded yet again via a newly de stabilised Afghanistan?) & The China belt & road
inititaive is the geopolitical prize held up as an excuse for further destabilization in the rush to digitize the planet on behalf of a facaded, cosmetic, unrepresentative crypto-ideologue
SCL group in Afghanistan
Must see: Targeted audience analysis thread by @SPYBT (PDF) {backup}
Operation MAR KARADAD
The Cambridge Analytica scandal that brought militarized targeting and profiling of citizens in democratic elections around the globe, was the culmination of years of research, development and methodology trials in NATO theatre's of war. Afghanistan was one such theatre.
The strategic purpose of controlling Musa Qala was to squeeze Taliban operations in south-western Afghanistan and to form a symbol of Afghan National Army and ISAF strength; the town had taken on iconic proportions, according to British officials.
The commander of the operation to liberate Musa Qala from Taliban control was Andrew Mackay of 52 Infantry Brigade.
"Our view of Helmand was that too much emphasis had been placed on the enemy and not enough on the population and understanding the environment" "We would embed Influence into all of our thinking, planning and execution. Influence became the first element of any operational briefing and all planning." - Mackay
"We would embed Influence into all of our thinking, planning and execution. Influence became the first element of any operational briefing and all planning." - Mackay
Assisting Commander Mackay in shaping the Information Operations (IO), and Psychological Operations (PsyOps), was Steve Tatham, then the Ministry of Defence’s first Director of Advanced Communication Research at the UK Defence Academy's Advanced Research and Assessment Group. Tatham detailed the IO and PsyOP strategy that guided Mackay in theatre. In order to maximise the effect's of the Influence Operations (IO) conducted in theatre; "Mackay was provided a tactical soft-power armoury of background and deployable culturally relevant and nuanced data to help him construct his in-theatre campaign".
Mackay and Tatham would go on to be members of the Influence Advisory Panel. The IAP were specialists in behaviour change operations and provided expertise to the Behavioural Dynamics Institute (BDi), the psychological research wing of SCL Group.
Along with membership of the IAP, both men would go on to form their own company aimed at providing "Information Operations Training & Advisory Services". IOTA Global operated under the SCL banner and provided NATO with an advanced TAA training programme. Andrew Mackay was the Executive chairman, with Steve Tatham the Director of Operations (Europe & Middle East).
In addition to support from the MOD;
"he was taken to meet the executives of the major pan-Arab TV channels in the Middle East. At these meetings he extended a personal invitation to the channels to embed their journalists with his forces."
Arab media would aid the propaganda effort.
"The Arab media duly embedded with British troops. One of the particular issues that we sought to address was the idea of ‘automated killing machines’."
The BBC were brought in to monitor the output of Arab and Afghan media to enable 52nd Brigade to;
"monitor wider coverage of events in the country and provide the Brigade Commander with the opportunity to rebut or address any specific issues"
The BBC and Arab language specialists provide MoD and Brigade Staff a weekly update of themes and issues.
"The team also elected to monitor blogs, discussion panels and websites of organisations and individuals opposed to the British presence."
The final assault on the town began on the afternoon of December 7. Leaflets had already urged the towns inhabitants to stay indoors whilst tactical information operations sought to deceive the Taliban in thinking the attack would come from different directions.
The leaflets were dropped in a specific area, targeting a specific group of individuals, saying, "We are watching you'" a spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).
The coalition began a gradual approach of psychological operations on the Taliban, including the phased deployments of manoeuvre units, beginning with Warrior companies, around the town, with pauses in between to allow information operations to take place and have an effect.
Radio in a Box (RIAB) provided by PSYOPS staff, which deployed to MSQ and provided the only local radio station in the town. Ultimately becoming a key source of detailed information to locals it was to become a full time job for the IO staff in the stabilisation team.
On the 11 Dec NATO announced the town’s fall and on 12 December General Moideen of the 3rd Brigade, Afghan National Army entered the town Musa Qala and reclaimed it for the Afghan national government.
With few ISAF soldiers present the event was recorded by the Abu Dhabi TV team placed in-theatre weeks before.
The Afghan face had a Muslim TV outlet.
The capture of Musa Qala representated a victory for NATO in the Afghan conflict, but for Andrew Mackay and Steve Tatham it was the making of a relationship that led them into collaboration with SCL Group.
SCL-NATO-MOD group ops outline:
"TAA can be undertaken covertly. Audience groups are not necessarily aware that they are the research subjects and government's role and/or third parties can be invisible. In short, it is a tried, tested and proven methodology." - Tatham
NATO StratCom will soon be an accredited training facility using Behavioural Dynamics Institute's "Target Audience Analysis Methodology" — a purposebuilt NATO course developed and delivered by SCL Group and IOTA Global of London, UK.
Virginia - NATO / Smart City testbed military surveillance / command and control
The Virginia Smart Community Testbed in Stafford County, Virginia, is the home to developing smart technology for the Commonwealth. It is the first Smart City Testbed involving an IoT platform, fully integrated with 5G and other new and emerging technologies for Smart Cities around the country. The Testbed will accelerate smart technology growth in the Commonwealth.
The testbed is a "shared knowledge platform" to develop practical and relevant smart technologies solutions. The Virginia Smart Community Testbed is a true public-private partnership involving multiple industry partners who will focus on relevant and practical use cases to produce innovative solutions using emerging and smart technologies.
Setting up a third joint force command in Virginia
"creates a link between North America and Europe and helps to further develop the desired 360-degree approach for our collective defense and security. Joint Force Command Norfolk is the first operational-level NATO headquarters in North America and is the Atlantic advocate within the alliance, enhancing NATO's readiness and responsiveness"
is stationed at Naval Support Facility Dahlgren, VA is located 53 miles south of Washington D.C. The detachment is a geographically separated unit of the 21st Space Wing, Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado.
In 1971, the Alternate Space Control Center was activated at Eglin Air force base and their back-up computation center was at Dahlgren. In 1987, the Alternate Space Control Center mission transferred to Dahlgren and operations were integrated with Navy Space Surveillance System.
|
|
The real prize being conflict = A never ending "war budget" for both "sides" (China/Russia vs Five eyes & all those affected by the fake spectacle) while in other areas they all develop further high tech weaponry & strategy, in tandem - to be used, as the lines are increasingly blurred between civilian & military - against all humanity. |
|
|
Endgame = divide and rule strategy of tension via humanitarian crisis as distraction.
Nation states are now purely puppets - the next step is the polarisation of identity as global digital avatar (defined as sustainable develepment based internationalism) against being proud of where you are born (legacy nationalism) the strategy of tension needs opposites & this is lining up nicely = the agenda
Could this be why we see so many fundemental Christians / Neo nationalists being alligned to fighting the biosecurity complex, when traditionally these demographics are against the social liberalism seen in the social freedoms, of association and movement of the 60's & 70's...while we see a Left wing completely seemingly in total allignment to measurements that are alarmingly similar to those of 1930's Germany.
|
|
 except 911...right Noam?
Noam Chomsky calls for unvaccinated to be ‘isolated’ from society in resurfaced clip |
The schizm of a so called neoliberal elite pushing for draconian measures is lost on those who cannot see the fascism inherent in these actions ALL stem from the events on 911, the war on terror that was enabled by the attacks themselves. The majority of supposedly rational leftists had it drubbed into them that it was all an anti-semitic conspiracy theory. It must be addressed that after witnessing the demise of UK Old Labours Jeremy Corbyn, who is about as anti-semitic as the pope is a pole dancer... for exactly the same psyop, by exactly the same people. The powerful Isreal Lobby defend against all hint of Palestinian activism & awareness to burgeon their hidden influence for the continuance of it's security state & intelligence apparatus globally as a bribery mechanism (see the Maxwell / Epstein nexus). Can we now, in the eyes of some, safely persue & join these dots? |
|
|
|
|
By the end of the first decade of the 21st century, the shamelessly steered Anti-Globalisation protests died whimpering after the totally non effective action gawped helplessly at the power of Wall St & The City of London in limitless bail outs of the 2008 economic crash that have normalised the insanity of infinite money printing we now witness today. The Neo-Cons & Neoliberals are, in fact, the same type of bird. Thus the confusion sown in the non linear warfare of the incessantly, and deliberatly confusing Faux bio-scare of the current Covid emergency. The reality is now apparent, that the Elites wish to see the "human tribe", splitting & branching off into a myriad of ideological oppositional, disperate ideological fighting forces.
The source of such divide & rule has been seen before in empirical foreign policies of the western nations, directly preceding & just after WW1, most notably The Opium wars on Manchuria, The African/Indochina/Persian adventures, & post WW2, The American Oligarchs Pentagon led secretive assault on resource rich or uncooperative regimes in the South & Central Americas, and in tandem, The NATO Strategy of Tension, throughout Europe, both of which utilised ex nazi high-ups not executed after Nuremberg, to fight Communism in Cyprus, The Balkans & former WASP Empire run African republics - The aim is to capitalise from division, funding all sides; training & equipping within an enforced echo chamber hoping to create extremism necessary to steer acts of confusion, disruption, terror & civil war. It could be argued that myriad of conflicts in Africa, are mirroring these strategies today. We can also witness the geo-strategic Ukraine being positioned for continued NATO/Russian posturing.
|
|
Cyber attack on freedom of political thought & expression
Thankfully, many aware of the Covid 19 Bio-security rouse, are not falling for it - as former differences are put aside by many who can see through the veil of these psychological strategic inititaives. On the other hand, the rabid censorship we see via Alphabets Youtube & Google has the effect of tyranny by nullification. Can it be argued that "Telegram" was a created agency, the purpose of which is to group - observe & entrap / label activists as extremists?
Are we witnessing a Strategy of Tension 2.0 under this newly announced Cognitive Warfare doctrine?
I believe it could be argued so.
|
|
|
(excerpt) -
Megan Squire, an Elon University computer science professor and Southern Poverty Law Center fellow who researches online extremism, says that, together, these social media and messaging features are "convenient" for online extremists.
"They can do radicalization and recruiting on one platform," Squire told Recode. These features also make it popular globally among activists. The app has been used by protest movements (Hong Kong) and extremists (the Islamic State) alike.
Last week, marking a rare departure from its much more hands-off approach regarding American extremists, Telegram blocked dozens of public channels for inciting violence, saying they violated the terms of service. This included a channel that, in the days before the inauguration, showed how to make and conceal homemade guns and bombs. This week, the app’s founder, Russian tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov, said after seeing an uptick in reports in the US, it took down "hundreds" of calls to violence on public channels.
|
|
Reading from their Technocratic Super Elite Belief steering playbook (see illustrations as examples accompanying below)- we may be able to infer that the push for global digital identity is intended to create a division concretizing atheism against tribalism as neo religion to bring about a global trans-corporate neo feudalism |
|
Many people are missing the most grotesque point inherent within social credit schemes - the results of actions being recorded to a profile are public & rewards / punishments are known to society - publicly shown - people willingly show them to each other as a way of out doing the others status. This was highlighted in the 2016 Black Mirror episode - "Nosedive".
So we can see that the normality prescribed in mandating vaccines & vaccine passports is in fact a social credit system in all but name. People who are Vaccinated are labelling themselves & in many cases acting as the entitled class, because they are given access to certain privelidges. These are promoted as normality. They are in fact enabling themselves by complicity, access to products offered in the consumer realm.
|
|
|
Those who aren't Vaccinated are acting in (steered?) oppositional defiance - especially the faux-radical 'pure blood' psyop which seeks to push a purist hygeine belief structure onto any activist refusing the mandated vaccination program.
People have been socially crediting their own cultural values, against other tribes, for Aeons via fashion, music, art as culture. The type of corporate/state psycho-technocracy inherent in technocratic control of health decisions puts it in the hands of the state control of action in order to consume via law a product manufactured by the elite corporate machine - in the case of Covid 19 - vaccines...made by a trillion dollar pharmaceuticals industry.
But who controls the culture industry? The mega rich Elite - who have from behind the scenes via PR advertising and billion dollar appropriation - been controlling how we think, feel and consume the products we are told are frivolous, casual & fun, or rebellious, challenging & emancipating.
Joining the dots becomes childs play when considering the control of online expression as a way of herding the decision making process of the online community. Vaccine passports push this data set as consumer systems analysis into a socio-physical reality that seeks to control access to products sold in the consumer arena of the Theater, venue, cinema, high street/shopping mall and further to Airports and seaports via access to the Vacation/travel industry.
|
|
The vaccination mandate program seeks to create an underclass of people who, after many have perhaps complied with earlier pandemic control measures, now find the apparently legal enforcement of a health choice unappetising to say the very least.
This leads one to ask if this, the threat of loss of access to normal society is perhaps driving a wedge in society that, as a form of cognitive warfare - intends to create a stategy of tension which enables a future scenario that will see unvaccinated / uncompliant being promoted via the mass media propaganda machine, as an enemy of the state.
|
|
We can expect a form of vaccine related terrorism
Note: use of Far right extremism
Remy Daillet-Wiedemann has gained followers with videos calling for a "popular coup d'etat", claiming face masks are "scientifically useless" and calling for the destruction of 5G networks.
A former politician who called for the overthrow of the French government has been charged with terrorism over a far-right plot to attack vaccination centres.
Other targets included a masonic lodge, according to the authorities.
Remy Daillet-Wiedemann was already accused of masterminding the kidnapping of an eight-year-old girl taken from her grandmother's home in April.
Carried out on behalf of the child's mother who had lost custody, it was found to involve a network of extreme-right supporters who authorities had placed under surveillance.
The girl was eventually recovered safely in Switzerland and French police put out an international arrest warrant for Daillet-Wiedemann, who was living with his family in Malaysia.
He was forced back to France and arrested when Malaysian authorities deported him for over-staying his visa in June.
He was jailed in eastern France in that case.
France: Former politician charged with terrorism over far-right plot to attack vaccination centres
Remy Daillet-Wiedemann, a former French politician whose popularity grew when he spread QAnon-style conspiracy theories, appears under guard in court for the first time on charges he orchestrated the kidnapping of an 8-year-old girl whose mother had lost custody of her.
ISIS K rebranding right on Cue - US attacks imminent?
October 26, 2021
The ISIS terror group’s affiliate in Afghanistan, known as ISIS-K, could develop the ability to carry out attacks against America within a year, a top Defense Department official told lawmakers Tuesday.
Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Jack Reed (D-RI), had asked Pentagon undersecretary for policy Colin Kahl if he agreed with a recent assessment by Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that “there may be a resurgence of international terrorism emanating from the region within 12 to 36 months.”
Kahl responded: “I think the assessment depends on which group we’re talking about.”
“I think the intelligence community currently assesses that both ISIS-K and Al Qaeda have the intent to conduct external operations, including against the United States, but neither currently has the capability to do so,” Kahl explained.
“We could see ISIS-K generate that capability in somewhere between 6 or 12 months,” he went on. “I think the current assessments by the intelligence community is that Al Qaeda would take a year or two to reconstitute that capability, and … we have to remain vigilant against that possibility.”
Pentagon undersecretary for policy Colin Kahl said ISIS-K could "generate that capability" to attack the US in six to twelve months.
How are they selling Climate Change to the consumer class?
It looks set to be another new normal that the climate change policy of nation states is going to follow Covid 19 policy. Rationing of food & power and continued "lockdowns".
This kind of societal psycho economic behaviourism, will usher in a new attitude to adherance as a kind of cultic worship pinned to the health of all creatures on the planet.
The Entitled will earn the right to consume via climate obedience, it really is that simple, until you realise that the economic shock testing & data analysis that comes from it drive the agenda of the real aim of this greed scheme.
The Climate via carbon initiatives can never be set to net zero - it, exactly like Covid zero, is an impossible goal... and, an unreachable target that further drives aspiration as a model for further societal control.
From this we may confer that the Elites would conspire to effect a new age religion based on agnostic scientism (the Rockerfeller One Health initiative) climate change as health of planet - biosecurity for all plants, animals and humans within that controlled paradigm system.
A constant war against human activity. Finding themselves locked in, in ever changable measures that drive consumer compliance.
A self serving vanity coma of virtual signalling, prone only to the auto-techno-analysis of data judgement within programmed blockchain AI systems. A machine that perpetually indoctrinates social responsibility as communitarian ideology.
Just like the Wars of old. The machine needs footsoldiers to follow orders, fight, and make a sacrifice.
Could we label this indoctrinated belief system a theology?
A cult?
It all sounds very far fetched doesn't it?
Communication and public engagement MARC VAN RANST
In this Publicly available lecture by Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, at the ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference on 22 January 2019. Van Ranst talks about how he "prepared" public opinion to h1n1 epidemic via mainstream medias in 2009.
Wed 19 Feb 2020-
Boris Johnson’s senior aide Dominic Cummings has been dragged further into the row over No 10’s decision to hire an adviser with eugenicist views after it emerged that he suggested in his own writings that the NHS should cover the cost of selecting babies to have higher IQs.
In a blogpost covering his views on the future of "designer babies", Cummings said he believed rich would-be parents would inevitably select embryos with "the highest prediction for IQ" and floated the idea that "a national health system should fund everybody to do this" to avoid an unfair advantage for the wealthy.
Experts criticised Cummings’s theories about genetics, saying they were unworkable, unethical and amounted to eugenics, two days after Andrew Sabisky resigned as a No 10 contractor over his past claims that black Americans on average had lower IQs than white people.
It may be prescient to read this series of articles put together by The Lucis Trust - long known to be an Elite New Age belief steering group - regarding the merger of new religion & science, expressed as a universal macro-micro conscious entity to be revered as a new world religion. (see Happytalism as cultic driver for green new age theocratic control)
"The Electric Bridge is a powerful symbol for serving in the fields of science and philosophy. As a service activity of the Arcane School, its aim is to help bridge the hiatus between esoteric and exoteric science through the language of electricity. It is the synthesising nature of electricity that will provide the foundation for a new Aquarian Science of Interconnectedness, enabling occultism to liaise with the science of the finite mind and demystify the divine nature of reality."
- The Lucis Trust - Introduction, Objective and Method
Technology & the plan - The Lucis Trust
As humanity is marched into the "Great Reset":
Could one argue that the weaponization of mass media has resulted in the misconstruing of post modern race & gender theory, which in turn become a type of schizo-archetype twisted into a form of virtual signalling existential awareness known to us as the woke'ism we see today?
This is to prepare future generations to a assexuality useful in preparing humanity for a notion of spray on identity more conducive to an interchangeabilty previously seen as 'skins' used in the cosmetic front-ending - appearances found in the look and feel of applications / operating systems; The underlying physical humanity is to become grey & utilitarian; a simple soulless mannequin for the coming all encompassing trillion dollar industry of digital identity avatar to be bought / sold & worn as an interchangable representation of identity.
This social change has become more notable as "computing" moved from corporate to personal and finally into an identity based expression of internet as hyper real crypto-global-village. Facebook failed to tie in interactive sandbox builder megagame MINECRAFT as an Oculus add on as a buy out in 2014
Avatarism as Pop culture echoes are notable (see this hugo talks on a new show with digital avatars
woke karaoke talent contest).
This can be observed via a push to move social media into a sandbox gamified augmented social credit system, which is based in a metaverse of varying virtual & augmented realities, and looks to be developing in conjunction with genetics as data, itself a bankable, ledgered resource, linking to identity as bio-security state/corporate control via Smart environments & blockchain AI.
“We believe that the right way to break through consumer indifference to VR is to deliver what they expect and want from the medium: THE METAVERSE,” reads the first slide of a 50-page document outlining a strategy for building a virtual world.
The three-year-old document, obtained by CNBC, laid the foundation for the futuristic ambitions of Meta, the company that until now was called Facebook. CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s hour-long demo on Thursday, which culminated in the announcement of the new company name, was designed to portray a very different world than the one we currently inhabit at a time when Facebook faces a non-stop barrage of negative headlines tied to the addictive nature of its social media products.
Cnbc oct 2021
WEF Young global leader ZuckerBergs metaverse project
check out the creepy promo as Mr Sugar Mountain chooses a skin then,
Note: In this promotional clip for the Facebook version of the metaverse - the point of view enters his head so you see what he sees in the metaverse - which implies they wish to hack your perception of reality while you're in there...viewing THROUGH YOU and your actions & decisions. Harvesting your private experiences as data - which in facebooks case - is no great suprise as Artificial intelligence is granted backdoor access to you & your childrens brain patterns via the decisions they make while immersed in this creepy world.
It's almost as if Mark Zuckerberg, by approving that editorial decision of first person POV - is announcing that this project is his "vision" - and, he wants the world to see everything the same way...the way he does, too. - The very definition of Megalomania.
Artificial Personalities To Populate Virtual World
also 2006 - Giulio Prisco - Transhumanism in the Metaverse.pdf
A fascinating experiment into personality and social interaction in which millions of software agents will potentially evolve their own culture is about to be switched on by five European research institutes. The NEW TIES project will be a virtual world populated by randomly generated software beings, capable of developing their own language and society.
The project has brought together AI experts, computer scientists, sociologists and linguists to study natural processes (like language development), and to advance the construction of collective artificial intelligence. “While individual, or machine, learning and evolutionary behavior have been quite well studied, social learning is still an unknown quantity,” says project coordinator Gusz Eiben, an AI professor at the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. “For the linguists and sociologists, the main motivation is to study existing processes in societies and languages.
The computer scientists on the other hand want to develop and study machine collaboration, with an eye on future applications in robotics,” he added.
The NEW TIES world will initially be running across a grid of 60 computers. The virtual world will support about 1,000 agents (artificial personalities) at first, building eventually to millions – each one a unique entity with its own characteristics, including gender, life expectancy, fertility, size, and metabolism. The agents will each have their own distinguishing characteristics to make them recognizable. Some of their traits will be inherited from their parents, and passed on to their offspring, but they will also be able to learn from their own experiences and from each other.
“We are not hardwiring agents,” stresses Eiben. “We are not programming how they behave. Each entity has its own ‘controller,’ analogous to a brain. And because we want to create an interesting controller, we have to produce a challenging world – otherwise there would be no impetus for development. So, in one scenario, we have created a world with seasons – so that the agents have to learn to find, transport and store food. And there are two rival groups, so they will have to learn to tell friend from foe.”
The artificial life-forms will have the ability to communicate, using a native vocabulary of a few simple words like, ‘food’, ‘near’, and ‘agent’. “One interesting question is how they will communicate,” says Eiben. “Naturally, the linguists want to see how they develop a spoken language, but for the AI researchers we will also test to see if there are possible alternatives – telepathy, for example.” Some basic rules will also be given, along the lines of, “if it’s hot, it burns,” but the agents are expected to add to the rule set as they discover new laws of nature.
Eiben said he hoped to eventually scale the world up to 5,000 computers, supporting a much larger population of agents, which he believes will kick-start complex emergent behaviors. Until then, he points to some intriguing results obtained from other platforms. His own findings have established that aggressive behavior increases in agent-worlds as life becomes easier, while an ideal world (ideal meaning maximum survival) has two main attributes: flexibility and mobility.
The project team is also working on a state-of-the-art visualization for its interface, to make its agents more comprehensible to a public well versed in The Sims and other computer realities.
see also - Emerging Artificial Societies Through Learning
To achieve complex behaviours, the NewTies project will study very large populations. The
resulting system will allow for sufficient complexity at the macro level to allow interesting
behaviours to emerge in separate parts of the system. Experiments of the proposed size
necessitate the use of a large distributed computing infrastructure. This is being implemented
as a shared platform communicating in a peer-to-peer fashion. This paper also addresses some
of the problems that arise in designing such an infrastructure.
** C-Avatar Capitalism
Avatars will be a form of new capital of the society, where they can be shared or owned by individuals
or companies. Avatars remotely deliver value of individual’s capabilities. This property of avatars opens
up opportunities for people of diverse backgrounds, conditions, and locations to apply their capabilities
anywhere in the world where such capabilities are needed. C-Avatar Capitalism aims to overcome the
limitations of human capabilities and uncover the potential of individuals.
Looking back to the history of mankind, serval turning points often labeled “revolutions” took place
and each transformed the industrial and sociological fundamentals of our civilization. Agriculture
liberated us from the risk of hunger inherent in hunter-gatherer lifestyle and impacted our community
structure. Industrial revolution was brought about by the invention of the steam engine that enabled us
to generate and deliver “power” and further resulted in mass production and eventually a drastic
change in mobility.
Capital intensive industrial structure was an inevitable consequence of
technological innovation. Information revolution, or information and communications technology
(ICT) revolution, amplified the power of capital and technological superiority. “Data” is the name of
the game, and one who owns a large amount of data and is capable of using it can industries and
influence our society and lifestyle.
A range of techno-social innovations have to be triggered and implemented globally to achieve the
vision of Society 5.0. WG1 proposes research and development on Cybernetic Avatar technology and
Avatar Capitalism, as associated techno-sociological transformation, can be one of the major pathways
for creating Society 5.0. Cybernetic Avatar technology enabling “capability complementation and
augmentation” to meet diverse needs of diverse people should be promoted to realize Society 5.0.
“Capability complementation and augmentation” implies that each individual can expand their own
abilities by overcoming the limitations of the human “body”, “brain”, and “space and time”. It is
important to establish technologies that can enable this. The technology will be a merger of artificial
intelligence, cyborg, material science, and biotechnology built on an ultra-high-speed low latency
global network.
Cyborg Avatar Capitalism is the associated sociological transformation where Avatars are
considered social capital enabling anyone to pursue various lifestyles that is currently not possible thus
WG1:Expanding human potential toward a society in which everyone can pursue their dreams
liberating existing constraints of physical, cognitive, and perceptional capabilities as well as
geographic and economic restraints.
Black Mirror episode - Fifteen Million Merits
(Episode aired Dec 11, 2011)
In this alternate, future reality, Bing and thousands of others must ride exercise bikes for hours a day to earn "merits", credits that can be used to purchase basic necessities as well as novelty items. They are surrounded by televisions playing mindless entertainment all day long, including TV shows that mock the odd overweight citizen who cannot workout, a lot of pornography...and a talent show similar to the real-world Got Talent franchise. When Bing meets, Abi, a woman with a talent for singing, he believes she can win the competition and earn a better life. However, after he makes sacrifice upon sacrifice to get her to the show, she is degraded and harassed by the judges and audience, who offer her a choice: start a career in pornography...or go back to being a slave. Her choice inspires a revelation in Bing, who begins to see the cruel injustice of the world in which he lives, and he is determined to change it...no matter what the cost.
We in the 21st century witness the rise of Psuedo-Communitarianism as The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals merge with the Technocratic World Bank global parliamentary forum / World Economic Forums Young Global leaders 2030 initiative via its unhinged 4th industrial revolutionary theory...
It is not at all a long stretch to note that all was set into motion by Turn of the 20th Century Nikola Teslas electric universe theory, later by Julian Huxleys transhumanist visions from 1953. Also one can trace via 19th century HG Wellsian future scenarios as the initiator of The League of Nations morphing into the UN & "right to rule" elitism galvanised by Galton Eugenics & bloodline royalty as asserted ancient caste system via the the promotion of great civilisations, such as the Greek, Egyptian & Holy Roman Empire, and without wishing to become too esoteric, the controlled brotherhoods of kinship & mutually assured prosperity.
It's a club - (see Trilateral Commission & Bilderbergs), which enables the nurturing & positioning acceptable leaders of society as "Official Rulers" of a planetary plantation.
Global economics? It's simply business as usual
In the early years of this century, Nikola Tesla seems to have stumbled upon certain of the behavioral effects of electromagnetic exposure[89]. Cazamalli, mentioned earlier, conducted his studies in the 1930s. In 1934, E.L. Chaffe and R.U. Light published a paper on "A Method for the Remote Control of Electrical Stimulation of the Nervous System."[90] From the very beginning of their work with microwaves, the Soviets explored the more subtle physiological effects of electromagnetism -- and despite the bleatings of certain right-wing alarmists[91] that an "electromagnetic gap" separates us from Soviet advances, East European literature in this area has been closely monitored for decades by the West. ARTICHOKE/BLUEBIRD project outlines, dating from the early 1950s, prominently mention the need to explore all possible uses of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Another point worth mentioning concerns the combination of EMR and miniature brain electrodes. The father of the stimoceiver, Dr. J.M.R. Delgado, has recently conducted experiments in which monkeys are exposed to electromagnetic fields, thereby eliciting a wide range of behavioral effects -- one monkey might fly into a volcanic rage while, just a few feet away, his simian partner begins to nod off. Fascinatingly, when monkeys with brain implants felt "the wave," the effects were greatly intensified. Apparently, these tiny electrodes can act as AMPLIFIERS of the electromagnetic effect[92].
Martin Cannon excerpted from his seminal examination of UFO abductees - THE CONTROLLERS:
A New Hypothesis of Alien Abduction
see also this selection of articles from MK researcher for OMNI magazine - kath mcauliffe
backed up pdf cited by Martin Cannon - is here as The Mindfields
the wave?
Leonard David writes:
"The idea of wireless power transmission dates back to Nikola Tesla near the end of the 19th century.
Fast-forwarding to 1968, the notion of a solar power satellite was detailed and patented by U.S. space pioneer Peter Glaser. He blueprinted a novel way to collect energy from sunlight using solar cells and beam down an energetic muscle of microwaves to receiving antennas ("rectennas") on Earth. Those microwaves could then be converted to electrical energy and supplied to the power grid.
Then, in the mid-1970s, microwave power transmission experiments in the tens of kilowatts were successfully conducted at the Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex in California, a facility of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory."
ref: story left; remember earlier in this page: Dominic Cummins writes in his blog about Qian Xuesen, the early systems analyst China's nuclear and space programs that influenced todays mega-projests such smart cities / social credit scheme. Qian studied in California at Caltech where he worked with the Hungarian mathematician Theodore von Kariman who co-founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) which worked on rockets after 1945.
is now a supranational global entity -
a de facto world government now it has pledged full allegiance to the UN?
what exactly is a strategic partnership?
COP 26 sees WEF 2020 initiative Young Global Leaders in Glasgow November 2021
A speech by HRH The Prince of Wales
at the Opening Ceremony of COP26,
Glasgow - 1 November 2021
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
The Covid-19 pandemic has shown us just how devastating a global, cross-border threat can be. Climate change and biodiversity loss are no different – in fact, they pose an even greater existential threat, to the extent that we have to put ourselves on what might be called a war-like footing.
Having myself had the opportunity of consulting many of you over these past eighteen months, I know you all carry a heavy burden on your shoulders and you do not need me to tell you that the eyes – and hopes – of the world are upon you to act with all despatch, and decisively – because time has run out.
The recent I.P.C.C. report gave us a clear diagnosis of the scale of the problem. We know what we must do. With a growing global population creating ever-increasing demand on the planet’s finite resources, we have to reduce emissions urgently and take action to tackle the carbon already in the atmosphere, including from coal-fired power stations. Putting a value on carbon, thus making carbon capture solutions more economical, is therefore absolutely critical. Similarly, after billions of years of evolution, Nature is our best teacher – in this regard, restoring Natural Capital, accelerating Nature-based solutions and leveraging the circular bioeconomy will be vital to our efforts.
As we tackle this crisis, our efforts cannot be a series of independent initiatives running in parallel. The scale and scope of the threat we face call for a global, systems-level solution, based on radically transforming our current fossil fuel-based economy to one that is genuinely renewable and sustainable. So, Ladies and Gentlemen, my plea today is for countries to come together to create the environment that enables every sector of industry to take the action required. We know this will take trillions, not billions, of dollars. We also know that countries, many of whom are burdened by growing levels of debt, simply cannot afford to “go green.”
Here, we need a vast military-style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector. With trillions at its disposal – far beyond global G.D.P. and, with the greatest respect, beyond even the governments of the world’s leaders – it offers the only real prospect of achieving fundamental economic transition.
So, how do we do it?
First: how do we get the private sector all pulling in the same direction? After nearly two years now of consultation, C.E.O.s have told me that we need to bring together global industries to map out, in very practical terms, what it will take to make the transition. We know from the pandemic that the private sector can speed up timelines dramatically when everyone agrees on the urgency and the direction. So each sector needs a clear strategy to speed up the process of getting innovations to market.
Second, who pays, and how? We need to align private investment behind these industry strategies to help finance the transition efforts, which means building the confidence of investors so that the financial risk is reduced. Crucially, investment is needed to help transition from coal to clean energy. If we can develop a pipeline of many more sustainable and ‘bankable’ projects, at a sufficient scale, it will attract greater investment.
Third, which switches do we flick to enable these objectives? More than three hundred of the world’s leading C.E.O.s and institutional investors have told me that, alongside the promises countries have made – their Nationally Determined Contributions – they need clear market signals, agreed globally, so that they have the confidence to invest, without the goalposts suddenly moving.
This is the framework I have offered in the Terra Carta roadmap, created by my Sustainable Markets Initiative, with nearly one hundred specific actions for acceleration. Together, we are working to drive trillions of dollars in support of transition across ten of the most emitting and polluting industries. They include energy, agriculture, transportation, health systems and fashion. The reality of today’s global supply chains means that industry transition will affect every country and every producer in the world. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the private sector is ready to play its part and to work with governments to find a way forward.
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, many of your countries I know are already feeling the devastating impact of climate change, through ever-increasing droughts, mudslides, floods, hurricanes, cyclones and wildfires, as we’ve just seen on that terrifying film. Any leader who has had to confront such life-threatening challenges knows that the cost of inaction is far greater than the cost of prevention. So, I can only urge you, as the world’s decision-makers, to find practical ways of overcoming differences so we can all get down to work, together, to rescue this precious planet and save the threatened future of our young people.
Thank you, Ladies and Gentlemen.
(some screenshots from previous pages)
see also my page from 2020 -
Oh no! Not another industrial revolution!
and
Planet Westworld
What Is the Global Public-Private Partnership
Geopolitics & Biosecurity
Sep 15th 2021 - The EU announces Megaproject
Geostrategic Rival to Chinas Belt & Road initiative
The EU wants investment in Africa
Nov/Dec 2021 - African Omicron variant is being hyped up to scare populations into digital Vaccine passport complicity
On 15 September 2021, the European Commission’s President Ursula von der Leyen announced that the EU would implement a connectivity strategy called the Global Gateway.
In her announcement, von der Leyen explained that the EU would build partnerships with countries around the world to drive ‘investments in quality infrastructure, connecting goods, people and services.’
Moreover, in what could be construed as an indirect criticism of the BRI, she highlighted that the EU will take a ‘values-based’ and ‘transparent’ approach to create links and not dependencies in countries.
There has been growing concern about China’s BRI creating ‘hidden’ debt traps in low- and middle-income countries due to a lack of transparency surrounding financing negotiations. The statement by von der Leyen on transparency and ethics is, therefore, significant given the context.
It is unlikely that the Global Gateway initiative will collide directly with the BRI. Instead, it will prove an interesting opportunity for the EU to fill the gaps that the BRI infrastructure doesn’t reach to build partnerships and drive growth.
Of course, the EU is faced with a steep task ahead in successfully rolling out the new initiative. Not only will it require sustained political and economic drive, but it will also need to gain the support of countries in the Global South — which isn’t necessarily guaranteed, given that some have already aligned with the BRI.
An Exciting Opportunity for Africa
The Global Gateway initiative could strengthen ties between the EU and Africa, making it a valuable growth partner for the continent.
When discussing the initiative’s goals of deepening trade links and strengthening supply chains, von der Leyen singled out the need to ‘develop new investment projects on green and digital technologies’. By combining the European Green Deal with the Global Gateway initiative, the EU could create a value-added relationship with Africa, with huge potential to develop economies at scale by contributing to the continent’s emerging green and digital economies.
How Will the Global Gateway Initiative Affect EU-China Trade Relations?
In 2020, China became the EU’s biggest trading partner, overtaking the US. However, it hasn’t been smooth sailing for the two economic powerhouses.
Fast-forward one year, trade relations appear to be strained. In 2021, the EU Parliament voted to freeze a huge China trade deal due to tit-for-tat sanctions. The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment was agreed to in December 2020 but has not yet been ratified.
The announcement of the Global Gateway initiative could further shake the boat. By focusing on building stronger investment links with African countries, for instance, the EU would diminish its reliance on China.
Only time will tell the full impact of the Global Gateway initiative because, as we mentioned earlier, the plan is still in its infancy. However, if it does evolve into a tangible, ethical and global project, it would boost the EU’s standing on the world stage as well as drive positive, sustained change in developing countries.
We now witness Todays Super Elite class of megalomaniacs via a Global Military industrial steering co-operative - A simple merger as expansionism beyond state corporatism - appointing ascribers to "on side scientism" via a Pyscho socio-economic behavioural global Super Mega Terra-project as zookeepers of the masses, trapped in a seemingly ever-hellish reality...only to be offered the bright hyper cosmetic escape route to "the virtual".
These naked emporers, must sit in their meaningless cosmetic wealth & gawdy opulent luxury... boasting to each other that we as the Human masses are as easy to programme within individualism or group, as an operant conditioned rat in a poorly conceived & executed 1950's science experiment.
It's up to you to prove them wrong.
tagged to the keywords "Q-anon"
"Terror" & "Child kidnap (inferring abuse)" -: Psyops for an agenda
but look at this futurescaped presentation
a project projecting possibilities for a
London 100 years into the future
by The Chatham House internationally renound thinktank
Chatham House - preparing public opinion
2019 - Dominic Cummins blogs about Genetic babies
The MetaVerse - the ultimate SEEING ROOM?
remembers he is actually a robot in reality, so sticks to his own skin...
then its gets even creepier, from our point of view;
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
2006 Mega project - Artificial Intelligence simulation testbed NewTies
Society 5.0 - Moonshot! The batshit plan for a future Japan!
Project moonshot (excerpts)
Just look at his face:
Just look at this plan:
This is a takeover plan by the UN & the WEF (Bilderberg/Trilateral elite)
Børge Brende (born 25 September 1965) is a Norwegian politician and diplomat serving as President of the World Economic Forum since 2017
The UN & The WEF effectively merged in 2019
Could it be argued that the WEF - AFTER STRATEGICALLY PLACING WORLD LEADERS
as part of its YGL program;
US Vice president caught in "child actors" furure!
SEEING ROOMS FOR A MEGAPROJECT PSYOPS IN ACTION:
CHILD ACTOR:
"a vast military-style campaign
to marshal the strength of
the global private sector"
Note:
with much more @Spacestation Earth
