Our Nazi allies
A German amateur investigator finds information on the U.S. government's friendly dealings with war criminals.
Meanwhile, the FBI and CIA guard their records.
By Ken Silverstein
- - - - - - - - - -
May
03,
2000
|
WASHINGTON --
D
ieter Maier, an amateur investigator working from his home on the outskirts of Frankfurt, Germany, has uncanny
luck finding out about U.S. ties to the Nazis.
For the past 20 years, Maier has been filing a steady stream of requests for information to a variety of
U.S. government agencies, largely for the existential pleasure of historical inquiry, and also out of a fear of a
rebirth of Nazism, fascism and racism in Germany. The more he knows about the past, he says, the better prepared
he is to deal with the future and present.
What is most startling about Maier's success, however, is that he appears to have had an easier time
finding information on U.S. collaboration with Nazis after World War II than a committee appointed by Congress to
extract the same controversial data.
Maier, through Freedom of Information Act requests, has unearthed new information on characters like Karl
Heinz-Priester, one of the most prominent postwar neo-Nazi leaders. According to "The Biographical Dictionary of
the Extreme Right," Priester, a former Waffen SS liaison officer, helped found the National Democratic Reich
Party in 1949. After being expelled for his dictatorial tendencies, Priester set up the equally virulent German
Social Movement and became a leading player in the international fascist movement.
Maier received files from U.S. Army Intelligence that show that Priester was on the U.S. payroll as an
informant, a fact never before reported. Priester was terminated as a U.S. spy in 1959 when it was deemed that
his usefulness was falling off, or as it was put on his file card: "Subject's services no longer needed.
Production and performance poor." (The FOIA is, unfortunately, a hit-and-miss proposition. I also filed a request
on Priester, and was sent, among other things, the identical file card -- with the notations identifying Priester
as a U.S. agent blacked out.)
That U.S. officials collaborated with Nazis after World War II is, of course, well known. Just one day
after Germany's surrender, on May 10, 1945, the Joint Chiefs of Staff ordered Gen. Dwight Eisenhower to arrest
all suspected war criminals, though advising him "to make such exceptions as you deem advisable for intelligence
and other military reasons." In other words, cut deals with war criminals who could be usefully employed by U.S.
intelligence. Over the years, the United States found a spot on the payroll for thousands of former Nazis,
especially as part of intelligence gathering operations aimed at the Soviet Union, our wartime ally but
soon-to-be mortal foe.
Not much has been learned about these programs since, with successes such as Maier's rare. But that was
supposed to change in the fall of 1998, when Congress passed the little-noticed Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act.
It requires government agencies to turn over to the National Archives all files relating to Nazi looting and war
crimes, including documents that detail American ties to Nazi war criminals.
"The former Soviet Union has opened its archives. Eastern European countries have done so; even Argentina
has begun to open its files on Nazis. Why are ours still closed?" asked former Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman, D-N.Y.,
at the time. Holtzman is now a member of the Interagency Working Group, which Congress established to oversee
implementation of the NWCDA. Federal agencies are to comply with the law by January 2002, but it's unlikely this
timetable will be met. Up to 10 million pages are expected to be released, but only 1 million pages, many of them
innocuous, have thus far been declassified.
There are some logical reasons for the delay. The job is enormous, and of course involves the review of
tons of paper held by numerous government agencies. Meanwhile, Congress failed to appropriate enough funding to
implement the NWCDA and then cut declassification budgets sharply last year. (In the case of the Defense
Department, they were cut by about half, to $100 million.)
Still, there are no encouraging precedents for this degree of disclosure. "From the end of World War II to
Vietnam to Iran-Contra -- you name it and [the CIA] lied about it," says Christopher Simpson, author of
"Blowback," the definitive book so far on U.S. collaboration with the Nazis.
Holtzman is optimistic the files will ultimately be released. But, "There's a long history of concealing
these files," she says. "The impulse to open them up is not in the genes."
Next page |
How many more Klaus Barbies are there? |