flash Intro Movie Down with murder inc Index News by country GOOGLE US DEFENSE
Down with Murder inc.

Bilderberg group.

BILDERBERG takes its name from a Dutch hotel where, in the early 1950s, the first meeting took place under the aegis of Prince Bernhard. The occasion has outgrown the hotel, but the Dutch link remains. Among several European royals who attend as occasional guests, Queen Beatrix and her husband come regularly. A Dutch professor who has brokered coalition governments into existence on her behalf is one of the secretary-generals (the other, American, one lives in San Francisco), and Bilderberg's tiny secretariat sits in The Hague. The meetings now take place by informal rotation in countries of the Atlantic community.

Some 100 or more attend, by invitation of a steering committee. The meetings happen once a year, in the spring. They last 2.5 days (Thursday night until Sunday lunch) and are held in varying but always comfortable surroundings - in 1987 Lake Como, before that Gleneagles. Apart from a half-day on the golf links or sleeping off the previous night's dinner, morning and afternoon sessions fill up the time.

A mixture of able and distinguished folk attend - a sprinkling of serving prime and cabinet ministers, central-bank governors, defence and other experts. They talk, often to galvanising and fascinating effect, about the main issues of the day - East-West relations, arms control, deficits, debt, the Falklands, sanctions, whatever. Their thoughts may not be repeated outside the meetings and never are. This frustrates outsiders but helps 100 great and good people be frank with each other, as does the fact that Bilderberg members are limited to people of NATO and West European countries who know how to be kind or rude to each other without causing such misunderstandings as would occur if Indians, Fijians, Africans, Chinese or Japanese were also present.

from The Economist - 26 Dec 1987

The Bilderberg Black Out

	 
IT'S THE SILLY SEASON: BILDERBERGERS ARE MEETING IN SECRET AGAIN

By Scott Thompson

(New Federalist, 06/10/96)
 

June  4  (EIRNS)   --   One   hundred   twenty   members  of  the
Anglo-Dutch-Venetian "Club of the Isles," and  their  associates,
met  in  secret  May  30-June  2 at the annual Bilderberg Society
meeting, which  was  held  north  of  Toronto,  Canada this year.
Present   were   two   Queens,   two   royal   princes,   various
representatives  of  the  Anglo-American   Establishment   within
government,  some  of  the  most  evil members of the Club of the
Isles,  and  a  large  number  of  prospective  recruits  to this
malevolent  oligarchy.   Also  present   were   about   a   dozen
representatives  of  the establishment media, who, like the other
participants, were sworn to  secrecy  over  what was discussed at
the meeting.
 
The host of this  year's  gathering  in  Canada was Conrad Black,
whose Toronto-based Hollinger, Inc., is owner  of  the  Telegraph
PLC  and the Jerusalem Post, which were allegedly taken over with
assistance from the recently retired  Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank
board member and drug lord, Li Kai Shi.
 
Black, who is a Bilderberg Society steering committee member, has
just finished taking  over  Southam  newspapers,  which gives him
control of 51  percent  of  the  papers  in  Canada.   Meanwhile,
through  the  American  Publishing  Co. and other concerns, Black
owns  80  daily  and  over  300  weekly  newspapers  in  the U.S.
(flagship is the Chicago Sun-Times) with a combined readership of
five million.
 
Hollinger, Inc. began as the Argus Corp., run by E.P. Taylor, who
was part of a British SIS nexus based in  Canada  and  aiming  at
penetrating  the  United States, through the likes of Sir William
Stephenson  and  the  operations   of  the  British  Ministry  of
Munitions and Supplies.  Among Hollinger's key personnel at  this
year's Bilderberg Society meeting:
 
  **  Lord  Peter  Carrington, now chairman of the Bilderberg
  Society (he was founding  director of Kissinger Associates,
  1982-84; Secretary General of NATO, 1984-88).
 
  ** Sir Henry  Kissinger,  KCMG  (Knight  Commander  of  St.
  Michael   and  St.  George),  who  has  been  for  years  a
  Bilderberg Society steering committee  member.  He was also
  Presidential Adviser for National Security (1969-75),  U.S.
  Secretary   of   State   (1973-77),   President's   Foreign
  Intelligence   Advisory   Board   member   (1983-89),   and
  self-confessed British agent.
 
  ** British grain cartel magnate Dwayne Andreas, chairman of
  the  Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) cartel, now under Justice
  Department investigation for price-fixing.  He has been the
  biggest contributor in history  to the organized-crime hate
  group, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai  B'rith  and  to
  Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kans.)
 
  **  Giovanni  Agnelli,  a  European  Trilateral  Commission
  leader,   Bilderberg  Society  steering  committee  member,
  member of the  International  Advisory  Board  of the Chase
  Manhattan Bank with Sir Henry Kissinger,  and  chairman  of
  Fiat  since  1966.   (Fiat  was reintroduced after being an
  Axis arms factory  to  world  markets,  when Agnelli had an
  affair with the then-Honorable Pamela Digby Churchill.)
 
  **   William   F.   Buckley,   the   Fabian    Conservative
  editor-at-large  of  National  Review,  who  has written on
  behalf of legalizing drugs and consensual pederasty.
 
Like the above individuals, Conrad  Black  is an integral part of
the Anglo-Dutch-Venetian Club of the Isles, and hence it  is  not
surprising  that  he  was  asked to host the meeting, held at the
luxurious Canadian Imperial Bank Leadership Conference retreat 40
minutes north of Toronto City.
 
              -+- Policy Debate Trickles In -+-
 
One of Black's hatchetmen  told  EIRNS  that  the agenda for this
years meeting included:  the Atlantic Relationship in a  Time  of
Change,  as  well  as  discussion  of a North Atlantic Free Trade
Zone; the Enlargement of the European Union and Changes in NATO's
Structure and Mission for More  "Out of Area" Deployments; China;
Russia.  Also, what is to be done about a growing revolt  against
IMF  conditionalities?   Also,  the  U.S.; former Yugoslavia; and
Sustainable Economic Growth.   With  virtually every top Canadian
Cabinet officer present, including Prime Minister Jean  Chretien,
one   source   reports  that  there  was  also  discussion  about
privatizing the multibillion-dollar Hydro Ontario.
 
                     -+- Royal Roots -+-
 
The Bilderberg Society  was  founded  in  the  1950s by His Royal
Highness Prince Bernhard,  who  had  been  a  member  of  the  SS
intelligence  unit  assigned to I.G. Farben that helped establish
Auschwitz, and, before he  married  the  Dutch Queen, Juliana, he
signed his resignation letter to Hitler, "Heil  Hitler!"   Prince
Bernhard  won  approval for the Bilderberg Society from President
Dwight Eisenhower and then-Director  of Central Intelligence Gen.
Walter Bedell Smith, through the manipulations of  his  *eminence
grise*,  Josef  Retinger,  who was variously charged with being a
Nazi and a  Soviet  agent.   Forced  to  resign leadership of the
Bilderberg Society for his part in taking Lockheed scandal bribes
in the 1970s, Prince Bernhard  was  represented  at  this  year's
meeting  by  his  daughter, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, and
His Royal Highness the Prince of Orange.


Conspiracy Nation

"It would have been quite impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries ..."

- David Rockefeller, Bilderberg club permanent member, 1991

A US law, called the Logan Act, states explicitly that it is against the law for federal officials to attend secret meetings with private citizens to develop public policies. Although Bilderberg 2005 was missing one of its luminaries, US State Department official John Bolton who was testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the American government was well represented in Rottach-Egern by Alan Hubbard, assistant to the president for economic policy and director of the National Economic Council; William Luti, deputy under secretary of defence; James Wolfensohn, outgoing president of the World Bank and Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of state, an ideologue of the Iraq war and incoming president of the World Bank. By attending Bilderberg 2005 meeting, these people are breaking federal laws of the United States.

part 1 & 2 of Estulins 2005 work

Elite power brokers' secret meeting

By Emma Jane Kirby BBC correspondent in Paris - Thursday, 15 May, 2003

The world's financial and political elite are to hold a closed meeting in France on Thursday where delegates are expected to be focusing their attention on post war Iraq. The Bilderberg meeting will be held in Versailles just before the start of the Group of Seven meeting of finance ministers in nearby Paris.

Bilderberg, which was founded in the 1950s by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, is said to steer international policy from behind closed doors. Its critics say that it is a capitalist organisation which operates entirely through self interest. By anyone's standards, it is a bit of a mystery.

There are no members as such - instead, an invitation list is comprised each year by an unknown steering committee, but participants are mainly leading and powerful figures in the fields of business and politics.

Political clout

The meetings are cloaked in secrecy and participants rarely reveal their attendance, although this year's list is rumoured to include the American banker David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger.

What the group actually does is no clearer either, although it's known to be an extremely influential lobbying group with a good deal of political clout on both sides of the Atlantic.

Key members of both the British and the US governments are said to have attended gatherings.

But critics accuse Bilderberg of being sinister and conspiratorial - if what the delegates are discussing is really for the good of ordinary people they ask, then why can't they publicise it? - BBC

Bilderberg: The ultimate conspiracy theory

By Jonathan Duffy BBC News Online Magazine - Thursday, 3 June, 2004

The Bilderberg group, an elite coterie of Western thinkers and power-brokers, has been accused of fixing the fate of the world behind closed doors. As the organisation marks its 50th anniversary, rumours are more rife than ever.

Given its reputation as perhaps the most powerful organisation in the world, the Bilderberg group doesn't go a bundle on its switchboard operations.

Telephone inquiries are met with an impersonal female voice - the Dutch equivalent of the BT Callminder woman - reciting back the number and inviting callers to "leave a message after the tone".

Anyone who accidentally dialled the number would probably think they had stumbled on just another residential answer machine.

But behind this ultra-modest façade lies one of the most controversial and hotly-debated alliances of our times. On Thursday the Bilderberg group marks its 50th anniversary with the start of its yearly meeting.

For four days some of the West's chief political movers, business leaders, bankers, industrialists and strategic thinkers will hunker down in a five-star hotel in northern Italy to talk about global issues. What sets Bilderberg apart from other high-powered get-togethers, such as the annual World Economic Forum (WEF), is its mystique.

Not a word of what is said at Bilderberg meetings can be breathed outside. No reporters are invited in and while confidential minutes of meetings are taken, names are not noted.

The shadowy aura extends further - the anonymous answerphone message, for example; the fact that conference venues are kept secret. The group, which includes luminaries such as Henry Kissinger and former UK chancellor Kenneth Clarke, does not even have a website.

DISCREET AND ELITE

This year Bilderberg has announced a list of attendees They include BP chief John Browne, US Senator John Edwards, World Bank president James Wolfensohn and Mrs Bill Gates

In the void created by such aloofness, an extraordinary conspiracy theory has grown up around the group that alleges the fate of the world is largely decided by Bilderberg.

In Yugoslavia, leading Serbs have blamed Bilderberg for triggering the war which led to the downfall of Slobodan Milosevic. The Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, the London nail-bomber David Copeland and Osama Bin Laden are all said to have bought into the theory that Bilderberg pulls the strings with which national governments dance.

And while hardline right-wingers and libertarians accuse Bilderberg of being a liberal Zionist plot, leftists such as activist Tony Gosling are equally critical.

A former journalist, Mr Gosling runs a campaign against the group from his home in Bristol, UK. "My main problem is the secrecy. When so many people with so much power get together in one place I think we are owed an explanation of what is going on.

Mr Gosling seizes on a quote from Will Hutton, the British economist and a former Bilderberg delegate, who likened it to the annual WEF gathering where "the consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide".

"One of the first places I heard about the determination of US forces to attack Iraq was from leaks that came out of the 2002 Bilderberg meeting," says Mr Gosling.

But "privacy, rather than secrecy", is key to such a meeting says Financial Times journalist Martin Wolf, who has been invited several times in a non-reporting role. "The idea that such meetings cannot be held in private is fundamentally totalitarian," he says. "It's not an executive body; no decisions are taken there."

As an up-and-coming statesmen in the 1950s, Denis Healey, who went on to become a Labour chancellor, was one of the four founding members of Bilderberg (which was named after the hotel in Holland where the first meeting was held in 1954).

this is a classic! it seems, anyone who questions secretive anti democratic meetings must be a loon! Timothy Mcveigh, David Copeland and Osama Bin Laden...blimey...

His response to claims that Bilderberg exerts a shadowy hand on the global tiller is met with characteristic bluntness. "Crap!" "There's absolutely nothing in it. We never sought to reach a consensus on the big issues at Bilderberg. It's simply a place for discussion," says Lord Healey.

Formed in the spirit of post-war trans-Atlantic co-operation, the idea behind Bilderberg was that future wars could be prevented by bringing power-brokers together in an informal setting away from prying eyes.

"Bilderberg is the most useful international group I ever attended. The confidentiality enabled people to speak honestly without fear of repercussions. "In my experience the most useful meetings are those when one is free to speak openly and honestly. It's not unusual at all. Cabinet meetings in all countries are held behind closed doors and the minutes are not published."

That activists have seized on Bilderberg is no surprise to Alasdair Spark, an expert in conspiracy theories. "The idea that a shadowy clique is running the world is nothing new. For hundreds of years people have believed the world is governed by a cabal of Jews. "Shouldn't we expect that the rich and powerful organise things in their own interests. It's called capitalism."

BBC

This conversation never happened. Well, it actually did. Date: March 5 to 8, 2005. Location: the isolated, fully-booked Dorint Sofitel Seehotel Ueberfahrt in Rottach-Egern, 60 kilometers east of Munich, Germany. Essential amenities: luxury rooms, a lake, a golf course, no suits - and no wives. Participants: 120-odd Western movers and shakers - politicians, tycoons, bankers, captains of industry, so-called strategic thinkers - invited for the 2005 meeting of the ultra-secretive Bilderberg club. Security: absolutely draconian. Global media coverage: non-existent. - Pepe Escobar

List of Attendees for 2005 meeting

So...How much influence do they Have?

Daniel Estulin went undercover to the Bilderberg meeting in March 5 to 8, 2005: here are some of his predictions:

Bilderbergers are planning to use what they denominated as a UN Peacebuilding Commission apparently to help win the peace in post-conflict countries as one of the tools in secretly imposing the UN tax on an unsuspecting world population.

3 months later:

1st July 2005 - China, Russia issue joint statement on new world order

UN REFORMS

The joint statement says that UN reforms should be aimed at strengthening the world body's leading role in international affairs, improving its efficiency and increasing its potential fordealing with new challenges and threats. UN reforms should be based on consensus through consultations, and should fully embody the common interests of the vast number of member countries. The United Nations is the world's most comprehensive, representative and authoritative organization, and both its role and function are irreplaceable, said the joint statement on a new world order in the 21st century. The United Nations should play a leading role in global affairsand be the core for establishing and executing basic norms of international law, the statement added. The statement calls for UN peacekeeping operations to be carried out in accordance with the tenets and principles of the UNcharter. Resolutions of the UN Security Council must be strictly abided by. Cooperation between the UN on the one hand and regional and subregional organizations on the other should be developed, according to the joint statement.

The joint statement also calls on the world body to play a bigger role in the study of global economic and development problems. - xinhuanet.com

According to Jeffrey D. Sachs, a Special Advisor to U.N. boss Kofi Annan, the U.S. stands at 0.15 percent and, therefore, "We are short by $65 billion each year." Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when countries were supposed to start spending far more on foreign aid, to the year 2015, when the 0.7 percent figure is supposed to be reached, that amounts to $845 billion over and above what the U.S. is already providing in foreign aid, currently estimated by Sachs at $16 billion a year. If the U.S. won’t provide the money voluntarily, the U.N. is prepared to go forward with a global taxation scheme. France is leading the charge for a global tax, which could total trillions of dollars and result in massive new resources for the U.N., the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. - by Cliff Kincaid Jul 5, 2005

to be fair France were saying this in January

January 30, 2006 saw this story hit the media

UN Unveils Plan to Release Untapped
Wealth of...$7 Trillion (And Solve the
World's Problems at a Stroke)

By Philip Thornton

Independent via GlobalPolicy.org
January 30, 2006

The most potent threats to life on earth - global warming, health pandemics, poverty and armed conflict - could be ended by moves that would unlock $7 trillion - $7,000,000,000,000 (3.9trn) - of previously untapped wealth, the United Nations claims today.

The price? An admission that the nation-state is an old-fashioned concept that has no role to play in a modern globalised world where financial markets have to be harnessed rather than simply condemned. In a groundbreaking move, the UN Development Programme (UNDP) has drawn up a visionary proposal that has been endorsed by a range of figures including Gordon Brown, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Laureate.

It says an unprecedented outbreak of co-operation between countries, applied through six specific financial tools, would slice through the Gordian knot of problems that have bedevilled the world for most of the last century. If its recommendations are accepted - and the authors acknowledge this could take years or even decades - it could finally force countries to face up to the fact that their public finance and growth figures conceal the vast damage their economies do to the environment.

At the heart of the proposal, unveiled at a gathering of world business leaders at the Swiss ski resort of Davos, is a push to get countries to account for the cost of failed policies, and use the money saved "up front" to avert crises before they hit. Top of the list is a challenge to the United States to join an international pollution permit trading system which, the UN claims, could deliver $3.64trn of global wealth.

Inge Kaul, a special adviser at the UNDP, said: "The way we run our economies today is vastly expensive and inefficient because we don't manage risk well and we don't prevent crises." She downplayed concerns over up-front costs and interest payments for the new-fangled financial devices. "The gains in terms of development would outweigh those costs. Money is wasted because we dribble aid, and the costs of not solving the problems are much, much higher than what we would have to pay for getting the financial markets to lend the money."

The UNDP is determined to ensure globalisation, which has generated vast wealth for multinational companies, benefits the poorest in society. It urges politicians to embrace some groundbreaking schemes put in place in the past 12 months to tackle global warning, poverty and disease, based on working with the global markets to share out the risk.

These include a pilot international finance facility (IFF) to "front load" $4bn of cash for vaccines by borrowing money against pledges of future government aid. The scheme, which is backed by the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, was born out of a proposal by Gordon Brown for a larger scheme to double the total aid budget to $100bn a year. In an endorsement of the report, Mr Brown said: "This shows how we can equip people and countries for a new global economy that combined greater prosperity and fairness both within and across nations."

The UNDP says rich countries should build on this and go further. It proposes six schemes to harness the power of the markets:

* Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through pollution permit trading; net gain $3.64trn.

* Cutting poor countries' borrowing costs by securing the debts against the income from stable parts of their economies; net gain $2.90trn.

* Reducing government debt costs by linking payments to the country's economic output; net gain $600bn.

* An enlarged version of the vaccine scheme; net gain (including benefits of lower mortality) $47bn.

* Using the vast flow of money from migrants back to their home country to guarantee; net gain $31bn.

* Aid agencies underwriting loans to market investors to lower interest rates; net gain $22bn.

Professor Stiglitz, the former chief economist of the World Bank and a staunch critic of the way globalisation harms the poor, said: "Globalisation has meant the closer integration of countries, and that in turn has meant a greater need for collective action. "One of the most important areas of failure is the environment. Without government intervention, firms and households have no incentive to limit their pollution." He said a global public finance system would force countries to acknowledge the external damage their policies had, "the most important being global climate change". Solving the environmental crisis tops the UN's $7trn wish-list. It calls for an international market to trade pollution permits that would encourage rich countries to cut pollution and hit their targets under the Kyoto protocol.

But - and the UN admits it is a big "but" - the US would have to sign up to Kyoto and carbon trading to achieve the $3.64trn that it believes the system would deliver over time. "We are dealing with a global problem as pollution can only be dealt with internationally," Ms Kaul said. Richard Sandor, the head of the Chicago Climate Exchange, added: "Many encouraging signs are emerging. When the business case is clear, private entrepreneurs step forward." But, the proposal is unlikely to get support from some green groups who believe that action to curb consumption, rather than market incentives, are the way to reduce carbon emissions.

Andrew Simms, director of the New Economics Foundation, said it left unanswered questions over how these markets would be managed and how the benefits and costs would be distributed. "We have nothing against markets so it would be missing the point to get into a pro- or anti-market stance. The point is how you distribute the benefits." He said the Nineties, the zenith decade for globalisation, had seen just 60 cents out of every $100 worth of growth reach the poorest in society, compared with the $2.20 in the Eighties. He said a pollution trading regime had the potential to deliver "enormous" benefits to poor countries, but said the UN report failed to show a detailed plan.

"Our view is that you have to cap pollution, allocate permits and then you can trade. But it depends on how it is set up. Because you are dealing with a global commons of the atmosphere, the danger is that you could be effectively dealing in stolen goods." He said a system set up now to trade in pollution permits could end up permanently depriving poor countries that joined the system further down the road.

International problems - and solutions

Pandemic Diseases

Millions of people across the developing world have died from malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/Aids, as well as from other pandemics. Vaccines needed to avert them require much-needed investment.

Solution: An advance commitment by rich countries to buy $3bn (1.7bn) worth of vaccines would be enough to encourage pharmaceutical giants to invest in finding medicines that would eliminate these pandemics.

Savings: $600bn

Alternative Solution: Vaccines are needed but more should be done in the meantime. Extra aid is needed for simple tools such as mosquito nets that would curb spread of malaria.

Pariah States

Big business and global money ignore countries where they see the risk of conflict outweighing their potential profit margins.

Solution: Guarantees by international organisations such as the International Monetary Fund to lower the cost of borrowing for poor nations by underwriting investors' loans to conflict-torn states.

Savings: $22bn

Alternative Solution: Sometimes large volumes of cash are needed and this is one. Live8 showed there was huge support among taxpayers for higher aid to countries in distress.

Hitting a commitment made in the 1960s of 0.7 per cent of GDP would unlock $140bn a year.

National Bankrupcy

Once great nations such as Brazil and Argentina were reduced to the status of beggars after poor economic policy combined with debts with national and international lenders.

Solution: A system to enable countries to take loans linked to their average economic growth rate to ensure that they do not have to cut public spending to raise the money to borrow needed funds during the hard times.

Savings: $600bn

Alternative Solution: A system to allow countries to seek protection from their creditors in the same way that US companies can take so-called Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Speculative Investors

Poor countries suffer most from swings in investment tastes by the big global investors that means money can leave as soon as it arrives.

Solution: Enable countries to buy "insurance policies" against big swings in growth that would ensure that they did not have to cut public spending every time. In 1997 it wreaked havoc across South-east Asia.

Savings: $2,900bn

Alternative Solution: Curb speculative investment by imposing a tax on foreign exchange transactions aimed at destabilising a currency. It could directly raise funds for development while preventing the worst excesses of the markets.

Global Warming

Scientists believe human activity has led to climate change and disappearing Arctic ice. The world's poor also have to live with lethal storms and floods.

UN Solution: A system of international trading in permits to allow pollution that would encourage countries to cut their emission of greenhouse gases so they can sell their "right to pollute" to other states. UNDP says it is more effective than just setting targets.

Savings: $3,620bn

Alternative Solution: An international approach is needed but one that prevents people from causing harm by setting pollution targets rather than trying to bribe them not to. Also agree global airline tax.

Brain Drain

Millions of skilled workers leave their home countries every year in search of a better life in the West. In some states nine out 10 professionals have left.

Solution: Enable countries to borrow on the open markets against the money workers send home. The capital would be used to invest in the country to build infrastructure that would discourage people from leaving.

Savings: $31bn

Alternative Solution: An international code of ethical guidelines overseen by bodies such as the World Health Organisation (for doctors and nurses) to monitor the harm that migration of professionals causes.


Estulin writes further

Additionally, the Bilderbergers discussed how to dust off a "boring" image of Angela Merkel, Germany's future leader. A short, over-sized male Bilderberger offered an opinion that in order for the widest cross-section of the German public to accept Merkel, the leader of the opposition Christian Democratic Union, as chancellor, it would be important to give a new definition to the term "family values." German Bilderbergers well-versed in conservative Bavarian collective psyche believe that Merkel´s image, a divorcee with a doctorate degree in physics, isn't considered "reliable" to attract sufficient votes in this staunchly conservative area of the country. The idea, according to people within ear shot of the discussion "in the up-coming campaign would be to stress the importance of families rather than marriage as an institution."

Bilderbergers pushing Schroeder aside in favour of a new candidate could very well signify that after three years of strife between American and European Bilderbergers over the war in Iraq, the secret society is ready to move forward with a much revised and cohesive policy. It must be remembered that Schroeder, along with French President Chirac, was one of the most vociferous European critics of the US-led Iraq intervention. Both Schroeder, representing the left and Merkel, representing the right, are owned by the Bilderbergers. It has been the group's policy since its inception in 1954 to own both horses in the race. For the record, every US president belongs to the Bilderberg Group or its interlocked sister organization, The Council on Foreign Relations. Although Bush junior didn't personally attend the secret meeting in Rottach-Egern, the US government was well-represented by William Luti, Richard Perle and Dennis Ross of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. - part 1 & 2 of Estulins 2005 work

sure enough: Schroeder deliberately loses the vote of confidence.

Schroeder loses confidence vote

Friday, July 1, 2005 BERLIN, Germany (CNN) -- German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder lost a confidence vote in parliament Friday, opening the door for possible new elections.

The confidence motion garnered 151 votes, short of the 301 votes needed as members of Schroeder's own Social Democrat party obeyed his request to abstain. President Horst Koehler now has 21 days to decide whether to accept the result and call an election, which would probably be held September 18.

"Without a new mandate my political program cannot be carried forward," Schroeder told a parliamentary debate on Friday.

He is trailing badly in the polls and has suffered a series of defeats in local elections.

A chancellor, Schroeder said, "needs a constant and reliable basis for his policies." He told the parliamentary debate he would seek a mandate "to continue what has been begun."

Angela Merkel, head of the conservative Christian Democrats, took the podium and said Schroeder's coalition could "no longer govern."

She said her party welcomed the chance for new elections.

If Merkel's party wins and can form a government, she would become Germany's first female chancellor. - cnn

How is Merkel presented to us?

'Maggie' Merkel, Germany's Mrs. Thatcher?

Angela Merkel is virtually unknown outside Germany, but within a few months this former East German chemist will probably be leading the third largest economy in the world. - ameinfo.com

Opposition Figure
Could Lead Germany

Obvious wouldn't you say?


German Parliament Debate Putting Troops On Street Patrol

Expatica | July 11 2005 - BERLIN - The deadly London terrorist attacks spawned a debate among leaders of all major political parties in Germany Saturday on increasing government surveillance and putting troops on emergency patrol in German cities. In a country where memories of Gestapo misdeeds and East German police state tactics are still fresh, a call by conservatives for a constitutional amendment to do away with post-war strictures on surveillance met with outrage from other parties.

Edmund Stoiber, premier of the state of Bavaria, said that a centre-right coalition including his Christian Social Union (CSU) ought to amend the constitution to allow federal troops to patrol streets in time of emergency. Germany's post-war constitution prohibits surveillance by the state except in rare instances. It also restricts German military deployment to strictly defensive missions and deployment abroad only as part of international peacekeeping missions. Stoiber's call for a constitutional amendment was condemned by the Free Democrats (FDP), the centrist party most likely to form a coalition with the conservatives after a September general election.

"This is a foolhardy and populist attempt to take advantage of public fears in the aftermath of the London attacks," said FDP head Guido Westerwelle. "We will have no part of such tactics and will not condone such legislation if we are part of a coalition."

Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's Social Democrats (SPD) also lashed out at the conservative proposal.

"The last thing we need is to adopt hasty new legislation of a far-reaching nature in a panic," said SPD Chairman Franz Muentefering.

The Greens, junior coalition partners with the SPD, also rejected Stoiber's initiative.

"The laws we have on the books already are perfectly adequate for any situation," said Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer, Greens party standard-bearer. "We reject any fear-mongering as part of our election campaign."

The standard-bearer of Germany's Christian Democrats, Angela Merkel, was to unveil her own party's election platform on Monday. The platform reportedly includes a plank calling for a constitutional amendment to widen deployment of Bundeswehr troops to include domestic operations. - expatica.com

German People KNOW, they will never forget: Police reject use of Bundeswehr

Wim Duisenberg - Bilderberger found dead

Wim Duisenberg was married to the controversial political activist Gretta Duisenberg. She became infamous when she declared she was aiming to collect 6 million signatures against Israeli policies; this figure was associated by some with the number of Jewish victims of World War II. During Wim's presidency over the European Bank, Gretta hung a huge Palestinian flag from their house in Amsterdam, which Wim later removed.

Wim Duisenberg, former chief of the European Central Bank who oversaw the introduction of the Euro in 2002, was found dead in the swimming pool at his villa in the south of France on Sunday 31st July EU observer

Wim Duisenberg, the former European Central Bank chief who helped create the euro currency, was found dead Sunday in his swimming pool in southeastern France, officials said. He was 70.

An autopsy showed Mr. Duisenberg had drowned after an unspecified cardiac problem, a regional prosecutor said. He was found unconscious in the swimming pool at his home in the town of Faucon and could not be resuscitated, police said.

Mr. Duisenberg ''died a natural death, due to drowning, after a cardiac problem,'' said Jean-Francois Sanpieri, a state prosecutor in the nearby town of Carpentras. He did not give further details.

Mr. Duisenberg was the first head of the ECB, serving from 1998 to 2003. Having shepherded the euro through its introduction in 1999, he became known as the father of the 12-nation European common currency. Wim Duisenberg, known as father of the euro

Wim Duisenberg's legacy

Bilderberg group information

German floods won't help Schroeder - pollsters

Updated: 2:19 p.m. ET Aug. 24, 2005 BERLIN - Severe floods in Germany will not boost Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's profile ahead of next month's general election in the way they did just weeks before the 2002 vote, pollsters said on Wednesday.

Schroeder's crisis management skills and deft handling of devastating floods in eastern Germany in early August 2002 helped him come from behind to win crucial votes in the economically deprived former East, along with his vigorous opposition to war in Iraq.

In an echo of events leading up to the last general election floods struck the country's Alpine areas this week as lakes and rivers burst their banks after days of fierce downpours, cutting off roads, power and communications.

But pollsters said this summer's floods were smaller in scale and Schroeder's Social Democrats (SPD) were so far behind the opposition conservatives (CDU/CSU) they could not hope to gain support through Schroeder donning his rubber boots again.

The 2002 floods killed 16 people and caused 15 billion euros ($18.27 billion) of damage. At the time Schroeder's SPD was seven points adrift of the opposition Christian Democrats.

This time around three weeks before the election on Sept. 18 the conservative's advantage has stabilised at 12 - 14 points.

Forsa polling institute chief Manfred Guellner said the floods three years ago hit many areas which had never experienced such a catastrophe, producing a huge wave of national sympathy.

"This boosted support for the SPD in eastern Germany, as Schroeder embodied and expressed this national rush of concern."

But Guellner added Bavarians hit by this summer's floods didn't need the nation's sympathy. Bavaria, is one of Germany's richest states. Schroeder will visit the area on Thursday but his presence could have only a limited impact. State Premier Edmund Stoiber, his conservative challenger in 2002, has already waded into the crisis zones, seizing the limelight from Schroeder.

Reinhard Schlinkert of polling institute Infratest-dimap said the gap between the major parties in opinion polls was too large and the situation completely different from 2002.

"I cannot imagine that this could once again bring about a decisive change in voter sentiment," he said. "Back then when Schroeder and his government already seemed lost, the floods were a sign they were capable of action." - msnbc

MERKEL WINS DRESDEN DUEL

After conservative challenger Angela Merkel’s win in Dresden, the last remaining district in Germany’s parliamentary elections, Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder signals he may be ready to relinquish his bid to lead a coalition government. An inconclusive September 18 vote denied either candidate’s party a majority. Europe expert Charles Kupchan likens Germany’s stalemate to Europe’s “political crisis” in an interview with CFR’s Bernard Gwertzman, while German policy expert William Drozdiak warns Germany could be “entering a phase of great instability;” a Der Spiegel op-ed says Schroeder’s Social Democratic Party may be preparing for life without him; and Deutsche Welle and the Financial Times provide election news roundups.

Schroeder appears to back away from leadership claim

03/10/2005 - 15:15:34

Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said in an interview to be broadcast today that his political future is up to his party to decide, showing apparent readiness to back off his insistence on being Germany's next leader.

"This is not about my claim, it is not at all about me personally," Schroeder told RTL television, according to a statement from the broadcaster.

"It is about the political claim to leadership of my party, and only the party leadership can decide on that. I will accept any decision." - IOL

Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group

Sunday, October 02, 2005 - bbc.co.uk - September 29, 2005

How much influence do private networks of the rich and powerful have on government policies and international relations? One group, the Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that it forms a shadowy global government. As part of the BBC's Who Runs Your World? series, Bill Hayton tries to find out more.

The chairman of the secretive - he prefers the word private - Bilderberg Group is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne Davignon, corporate director and former European Commissioner.

In his office, on a private floor above the Brussels office of the Suez conglomerate lined with political cartoons of himself, he told me what he thought of allegations that Bilderberg is a global conspiracy secretly ruling the world.

"It is unavoidable and it doesn't matter," he says. "There will always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a much more incoherent fashion."

Lack of publicity

In an extremely rare interview, he played down the importance of Bilderberg in setting the international agenda. "What can come out of our meetings is that it is wrong not to try to deal with a problem. But a real consensus, an action plan containing points 1, 2 and 3? The answer is no. People are much too sensible to believe they can do that."

Every year since 1954, a small network of rich and powerful people have held a discussion meeting about the state of the trans-Atlantic alliance and the problems facing Europe and the US. Organised by a steering committee of two people from each of about 18 countries, the Bilderberg Group (named after the Dutch hotel in which it held its first meeting) brings together about 120 leading business people and politicians.

At this year's meeting in Germany, the audience included the heads of the World Bank and European Central Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP, Unilever, DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi - among other multi-national corporations, editors from five major newspapers, members of parliament, ministers, European commissioners, the crown prince of Belgium and the queen of the Netherlands.

"I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because I don't think a global ruling class exists. I simply think it's people who have influence interested to speak to other people who have influence," Viscount Davignon says. "Bilderberg does not try to reach conclusions - it does not try to say 'what we should do'. Everyone goes away with their own feeling and that allows the debate to be completely open, quite frank - and to see what the differences are. "Business influences society and politics influences society - that's purely common sense. It's not that business contests the right of democratically-elected leaders to lead".

For Bilderberg's critics the fact that there is almost no publicity about the annual meetings is proof that they are up to no good. Jim Tucker, editor of a right-wing newspaper, the American Free Press for example, alleges they organise wars and elect and depose political leaders. He describes the group as simply 'evil'.

So where does the truth lie?...

Professor Kees van der Pijl of Sussex University in Britain says such private networks of corporate and political leaders play an informal but crucial role in the modern world.

"There need to be places where these people can think about the main challenges ahead, co-ordinate where policies should be going, and find out where there could be a consensus."

'Common sense'

Will Hutton, an economic analyst and former newspaper editor who attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take part in these networks in order to influence the way the world works, to create what he calls "the international common sense" about policy.

"On every issue that might influence your business you will hear at first-hand the people who are actually making those decisions and you will play a part in helping them to make those decisions and formulating the common sense," he says.

And that "common sense" is one which supports the interests of Bilderberg's main participants - in particular free trade. Viscount Davignon says that at the annual meetings, "automatically around the table you have internationalists" - people who support the work of the World Trade Organisation, trans-Atlantic co-operation and European integration.

Bilderberg meetings often feature future political leaders shortly before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while still an opposition MP. All the recent presidents of the European Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed.

'Secret Government'

This has led to accusations that the group pushes its favoured politicians into high office. But Viscount Davignon says his steering committee are simply excellent talent spotters. The steering committee "does its best assessment of who are the bright new boys or girls in the beginning phase of their career who would like to get known." "It's not a total accident, but it's not a forecast and if they go places it's not because of Bilderberg, it's because of themselves," Viscount Davignon says.

But its critics say Bilderberg's selection process gives an extra boost to aspiring politicians whose views are friendly to big business. None of this, however, is easy to prove -- or disprove.

Observers like Will Hutton argue that such private networks have both good and bad sides. They are unaccountable to voters but, at the same time, they do keep the international system functioning. And there are limits to their power - a point which Bilderberg chairman was keen to stress, "When people say this is a secret government of the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we should be bloody ashamed of ourselves."

Informal and private networks like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and globalisation for the past half a century. In the eyes of critics they have undermined democracy, but their supporters believe they are crucial to modern democracy's success. And so long as business and politics remain mutually dependent, they will continue to thrive. - BBC

Suprise suprise!

SCHROEDER SHEDS GOVERNMENT ROLE

Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder tells a trade union conference he “will not belong to the next government” (AP), a day after Angela Merkel, leader of the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU), announces a deal with Schroeder’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) that allows her to become Germany’s next chancellor (Deutsche Welle). The SPD lost last month’s parliamentary elections to the CDU, but voters denied either party a majority, forcing the parties to create a coalition government. Merkel’s hard-won victory as chancellor comes at a cost: SPD controls 8 of 14 ministries under the deal, including such key posts as finance, foreign affairs, and labor (BBC). German policy expert William Drozdiak says Berlin's grand coalition government amounts to a "national emergency government" in an interview with CFR's Bernard Gwertzman; Merkel is profiled here in the New York Times; and CFR Europe Fellow Charles Kupchan likens Germany’s stalemate to Europe’s “political crisis” from CFR.

so...what kind of leader is Merkyl? A Bilderberg stooge

German women told: we need more babies

By Kate Connolly in Berlin (Filed: 28/01/2006)

Chancellor Angela Merkel has pushed Germany's low birth rate to the top of the political agenda for the first time since the Nazi era as an expert said the nation could die out if the trend continued.

A third of German women are not having children, a remarkable figure even compared with low birth rates in the rest of Europe. Among graduates the figure is as high as 40 per cent. Every year 100,000 more Germans die than are born and each generation is shrinking by about a third. Even in the poverty and despair after the Second World War, more babies were born than now. The figure has slumped to 1.3 children per woman, far short of the replacement rate of 2.1.

Some observers attribute the trend to young people's reluctance to sacrifice their comfortable way of life and leisure time to bring up the next generation. Others argue that German society expects women to stay at home to look after the family and that child care is inadequate and expensive.

Mrs Merkel, 51, is not the best role model: she has no children. Asked why, she said: "It just did not fit in with my career path." But she is fully aware that the onus is on her, the country's first female leader, to improve the lot of women, raise the birth rate and put Germany back at the top as an economic power within a decade.

"If the birth rate continues to fall, Germans are at risk of dying out," said Harald Michel, the head of the Institute for Applied Demography. He foresees a future in which the workforce will be unable to support the elderly, nor indeed the country.

Past reluctance to tackle the problem is largely explained by the sensitivity of child-bearing in a country which, under the Nazis, did all it could to raise the birth rate for the state. "The Nazi ideal of kinder, küche, kirche (children, kitchen, church) still prevails," said Jutta Schmidt, 33, a sociologist and mother of two children from Hamburg. "The pressure on women to fulfil the maternal role, coupled with the lack of support to carry it out, such as part-time jobs and child care provision, is so great that many would rather forgo the opportunity than risk failure."

In Nazi times women were awarded motherhood medals for bearing children. Child bearing was strictly under the control of the state, not the individual. Had Ursula von der Leyen, 47, been a mother in the Third Reich, she would have won the silver medal. She is a gynaecologist, a mother of seven and, as the family minister, is Mrs Merkel's greatest hope. She says that Germany is "extremely backward" in its attitude towards the family. Unless the birth rate rises, "we will have to turn out the light".

Mrs von der Leyen, a member of the Christian Democratic Union, has offered women one-year wage replacement subsidies and to raise the amount of child care that can be offset against tax. But some of her proposals, such as encouraging fathers to stay at home for two months after the birth of a child, have provoked stiff opposition even from male party colleagues. They accuse her of wanting to "tie men to the nappies".

For many, child care and not money is at the root of the problem. The country that invented the kindergarten 170 years ago is pitifully lacking in child care places. Only 10 per cent of children under three have access to pre-school care and most of those are sent home at noon, a 2001 study showed. In Denmark the figure is 64 per cent and in Britain 34 per cent. The problem is exacerbated by employers who are unwilling to help workers with young children - and schools, most of which also close at noon.

"People have to give up their careers because there are no child care places," said Renate Köcher, the director of the Allensbach polling institute. "And because they have given up their jobs, we have neglected to create more child care places."

Germany is also a country in which everything happens comparatively late. The average starting school age is almost seven. University takes the best part of a decade to complete, so the average student is in her late twenties when she graduates. Therefore, finding a job, particularly in these days of high unemployment, stands much higher on the list of priorities than having babies. - telegraph.co.uk

Bono [yet another stooge] praises German chancellor

London: U2 lead singer Bono has found a new ally in German chancellor Angela Merkel for fighting poverty in Africa.

Bono is thrilled that Merkel is pledging to donate 0.7 percent of Germany's GDP to help the world's poor until 2015 and also has high hopes for his relationship with the politician, contactmusic.com reported.

He says: "Her words are music to my ears. As a woman, she doesn't act macho or has to show off her skills. She is no day dreamer, she's a go-getter. Merkel is incredibly pragmatic. She has the power to change something. Me and many other people pin our hopes on her." - newkerala

Merkel Pledges To Reduce EU Bureaucracy,

by Ulrika Lomas, for LawAndTax-News.com, Brussels 27 January 2006

Speaking at the opening of the World Economic Forum's annual meeting in Davos this week, German Chancellor, Angela Merkel called for "international rules to frame global competition".

Suggesting that increased cooperation between countries, with the oversight of international bodies such as the World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary Fund would help to foster innovation, Ms Merkel stated that such a drive could - paradoxically - go hand-in-hand with a reduction in bureaucracy, particularly in the European Union.

Stating that:

"We must get away from the idea that a directive is in place for all time and can never be reconsidered," the German Chancellor announced that during Germany's term at the head of the EU next year, there will be a clamp-down on red tape, with obsolete legislation removed and expiry dates included in new legislation.

"Between 4 and 6 percent of all costs for small and mid-size companies in Germany goes into red tape," she went on to reveal, adding that: "We must learn to measure the cost of bureaucracy." - tax-news.com .

German chancellor issues Iran warning

30/01/2006 - Iran will be a threat to the Middle East and wider world if it gets it hands on nuclear weapons, German chancellor Angela Merkel said yesterday. Germany's first female chancellor was speaking to journalists after talks in Jerusalem with interim Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert at the start of her Middle East tour.

Both Mrs Merkel and Mr Olmert agreed to decline talks with Hamas, the winner of last week's parliamentary election, unless the Palestinian militant group recognises the state of Israel. Mrs Merkel said Europe would end its aid to the Palestinian Authority if Hamas resisted.

The EU gives the Palestinian Authority £341 million a year.

"Such a Palestinian Authority cannot be directly supported by money from the EU," she said.

The US says Iran is intent on acquiring nuclear weaponry.

Tehran rejects the accusation.

Mrs Merkel also condemned Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for saying Israel should be "wiped off the map" and suggesting the Holocaust may never have happened. Britain, Germany and France - the so-called EU-3 - have led diplomatic efforts over the past two years to rein in Iran's nuclear brinkmanship.

In London today, EU-3 officials meet with foreign ministers from US, Russia, and China - permanent members of the UN security council - to discuss Iran.

The meeting comes ahead of the make-or-break IAEA meeting on February 2nd. The IAEA may conclude that the UN security council has no choice but to impose sanctions. At a news conference in Tehran yesterday, Hamid Reza Asefi, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman, called for more dialogue to overcome the latest impasse. Hamas leader, Mr Khaled Mashaal, has urged all political groups in Palestine to collaborate in forming a new government. - dehavilland.co.uk .

Merkel demands upgrade of NATO strategy

06.02.2006 - 09:34 CET | By Lisbeth Kirk

Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has said NATO should be a permanent forum for analysis of world security threats in the future.

Speaking at an annual high-profile security conference in Munich, she pledged her allegiance to the body, stating that all political and military measures of NATO members should be discussed and planned at NATO first.

Only if NATO member states cannot jointly follow the same path should alternatives be sought.

"To my opinion it [NATO] should be the permanent forum, where common analysis of threats are carried out and discussed," Ms Merkel said. "It should be the pace for political consultation over new conflicts, which flame up around the world, and should to my opinion be the place for political and military co-ordination of activities," she told the biggest annual gathering of western defence ministers, military commanders and defence industry leaders held over the weekend.

Ms Merkel also called for a fresh debate of NATO's central strategic concept by 2008 or 2009 to define new tasks for the alliance.

Meanwhile US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld urged more European spending on military and NATO secretary general Jaap de Hoop Scheffer pleaded for closer ties between NATO and like-minded states elsewhere on the globe.

Mr de Hoop Scheffer said "NATO is not a global policeman" and called for enhanced relations with democratic states in Asia such as Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

Meanwhile, UK defence secretary John Reid warned NATO members that they must change for the alliance to survive. Speaking to Associated Press, he said NATO is not guaranteed to "survive and prosper as the cornerstone of the collective security we need" but must change in order to meet new challenges, according to the BBC. "NATO has been probably the most effective defence organisation in world history, but no institution has the divine right to exist," he said.

The discussion of a new role for NATO was launched at last year's Munich conference, when the then German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder caused surprise among his NATO colleagues by saying NATO risked becoming outdated and was "no longer the primary venue where transatlantic partners discuss and co-ordinate strategies." He proposed setting up a "high-ranking panel of independent figures," which would suggest improvements and called for a greater role for the EU.

Spanish ex-prime minister Jose Maria Aznar also recently suggested that NATO should not only resolve its lack of military capabilities, but also undergo a complex institutional reform and re-think its priorities.

Whether a sign of diminished influence or not - the traditional protests accompanying the Munich Conference on Security Policy were significantly weaker this year. Instead of the 5,000 demonstrators expected to march against armament and war, only 1,700 eventually found their way to Munich, according to police. - euobserver.com

Captain Wardrobes

Down with Murder inc.